2015
DOI: 10.1193/120212eqs345m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Displacement-Based Seismic Design for Reinforced Masonry Shear-Wall Structures, Part 2: Validation with Shake-Table Tests

Abstract: This paper provides a comprehensive validation of a displacement-based seismic design procedure proposed in a companion paper for reinforced masonry shear-wall structures. For this purpose, a full-scale, two-story reinforced masonry specimen was tested on a shake table to examine the global and local behaviors of a low-rise reinforced masonry building designed by the proposed displacement-based procedure, and to validate the analytical tool used in the design process. This specimen successfully resisted repeat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the design was not further refined at this stage. As discussed in the companion paper (Ahmadi et al 2015) on verification, the design was later checked using nonlinear time-history analysis and was judged satisfactory for the ground motions selected for testing. Figure 23 shows the maximum deformation demands in Walls W-1, W-2, and W-3 at the ground level, under DE-and MCE-level motions, calculated in the pushover analysis described previously.…”
Section: Required Base Shear For Two-story Specimenmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the design was not further refined at this stage. As discussed in the companion paper (Ahmadi et al 2015) on verification, the design was later checked using nonlinear time-history analysis and was judged satisfactory for the ground motions selected for testing. Figure 23 shows the maximum deformation demands in Walls W-1, W-2, and W-3 at the ground level, under DE-and MCE-level motions, calculated in the pushover analysis described previously.…”
Section: Required Base Shear For Two-story Specimenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the design was not further refined at this stage. As discussed in the companion paper (Ahmadi et al 2015) on verification, the design was later checked using nonlinear time-history analysis and was judged satisfactory for the ground motions selected for testing.…”
Section: Displacement-based Design Of Two-story Cmu Specimenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholars had conducted a lot of research on displacement‐based seismic design of structural forms such as shear wall structures, 16 frame structures, 17–19 and hybrid structures, 20,21 and the method had gradually matured 22–24 . Lin et al 25 conducted an experimental study on three reinforced concrete columns designed using the displacement method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance design of seismic structure based on displacement first needs to determine the performance design control parameters such as seismic strengthening level, performance level, and performance objective, while considering the importance of the building structure, site conditions, and the needs of the owner, to carry out the performance design not lower than basic seismic strengthening objective. [13][14][15] Scholars had conducted a lot of research on displacement-based seismic design of structural forms such as shear wall structures, 16 frame structures, [17][18][19] and hybrid structures, 20,21 and the method had gradually matured. [22][23][24] Lin et al 25 conducted an experimental study on three reinforced concrete columns designed using the displacement method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A displacement based approach was proposed by Calvi [9] but it applies to seismic vulnerability assessment of existing masonry buildings at regional scale. In case of reinforced masonry buildings, a DDBD procedure was developed and validated through shaking table tests [10,11]. In this paper, the DDBD approach is specialised to unreinforced masonry (URM) buildings at site-specific scale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%