2005
DOI: 10.1007/s00254-005-0057-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Displacement behavior of CH4 adsorbed on coals by injecting pure CO2, N2, and CO2–N2 mixture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
42
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
4
42
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of CH 4 , the isotherms exhibit also a maximum, though less pronounced, whereas for N 2 this is not visible, the measuring conditions being far above the critical temperature. It is well known that coal has a higher sorption capacity for CO 2 compared to CH 4 , and even more compared to N 2 (Fitzgerald et al, 2005;Shimada et al, 2005;Bae and Bhatia, 2006;Sakurovs et al, 2007). This behavior, which has also been observed for all the coals tested here, is a prerequisite for a successful ECBM operation.…”
Section: Comparison Of Different Coalssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…In the case of CH 4 , the isotherms exhibit also a maximum, though less pronounced, whereas for N 2 this is not visible, the measuring conditions being far above the critical temperature. It is well known that coal has a higher sorption capacity for CO 2 compared to CH 4 , and even more compared to N 2 (Fitzgerald et al, 2005;Shimada et al, 2005;Bae and Bhatia, 2006;Sakurovs et al, 2007). This behavior, which has also been observed for all the coals tested here, is a prerequisite for a successful ECBM operation.…”
Section: Comparison Of Different Coalssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…This ratio decreases with increasing temperature (Bae and Bhatia, 2006;Li et al, 2010). The sorption capacity ratios of CO 2 to N 2 are found to be between 2:1 and 8.5:1 (Battistutta et al, 2010;Saghafi et al, 2007;Shimada et al, 2005). However, some coals under certain conditions show a larger sorption capacity to CH 4 than to CO 2 (Busch et al, 2003;Busch et al, 2006;Majewska et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In addition, an extensive set of high-pressure adsorption data of CO 2 , CH 4 and N 2 and their mixtures on three water-moistened coals, namely Fruitland, Tiffany and Illinois, was reported, and the data were described using a simplified local-density model (Fitzgerald et al 2005;Fitzgerald and Robinson 2006). The displacement of CH 4 adsorbed on coals by injecting either pure CO 2 , pure N 2 or CO 2 /N 2 mixtures was investigated on a dried Japanese coal sample (Shimada et al 2005), and CO 2 -CH 4 binary adsorption measurements on two types of Polish coal have also been reported (Ceglarska-Stefanska and Zarebska 2005). Finally, the adsorption of pure CO 2 and a flue gas (containing mainly nitrogen, carbon dioxide, hydrogen and methane) on a coal sample from the Silesian Basin in Poland in dry and wet state was recently investigated, showing that CO 2 was the most and CH 4 the second most preferred component adsorbed (Mazumder et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%