2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.106739
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Displacement-function modeling of thermo-mechanical behavior of fiber-reinforced composite structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the flexibility of the design and the uncertainty of the manufacture, the volume content, the microscopic distribution, and the arrangement direction of reinforcing fibers in CCF/PEEK composites would vary significantly. Therefore, evaluating the mechanical performance of composites cannot solely rely on tests, but requires theoretical models and numerical simulations to deepen the understanding of the mechanical properties at different scales from the fiber level to the structure level 19–23 . Up to now, various theoretical models have been developed to predict the elastic response of unidirectional (UD) composites based on the micro‐mechanical approaches, such as the generalized cells model, 24 simplified unit cell model, 25 Mori‐Tanaka model, 26 Chamis model, 27,28 free shear traction (FST) method, 29 bridging model, 30 and so forth, which have been widely applied to predict the elastic mechanical response of UD composites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to the flexibility of the design and the uncertainty of the manufacture, the volume content, the microscopic distribution, and the arrangement direction of reinforcing fibers in CCF/PEEK composites would vary significantly. Therefore, evaluating the mechanical performance of composites cannot solely rely on tests, but requires theoretical models and numerical simulations to deepen the understanding of the mechanical properties at different scales from the fiber level to the structure level 19–23 . Up to now, various theoretical models have been developed to predict the elastic response of unidirectional (UD) composites based on the micro‐mechanical approaches, such as the generalized cells model, 24 simplified unit cell model, 25 Mori‐Tanaka model, 26 Chamis model, 27,28 free shear traction (FST) method, 29 bridging model, 30 and so forth, which have been widely applied to predict the elastic mechanical response of UD composites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, evaluating the mechanical performance of composites cannot solely rely on tests, but requires theoretical models and numerical simulations to deepen the understanding of the mechanical properties at different scales from the fiber level to the structure level. [19][20][21][22][23] Up to now, various theoretical models have been developed to predict the elastic response of unidirectional (UD) composites based on the micro-mechanical approaches, such as the generalized cells model, 24 simplified unit cell model, 25 Mori-Tanaka model, 26 Chamis model, 27,28 free shear traction (FST) method, 29 bridging model, 30 and so forth, which have been widely applied to predict the elastic mechanical response of UD composites. To solve the timeÀ/temperature-dependent anisotropic problems, some of the models can be extended to incorporate the elastic-viscoelastic correspondence principle.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, these papers and the present one belong to the broad field of research on thermo-mechanics of heterogeneous/composite materials and structures. The thermo-mechanical couplings are constantly a subject of intensive scientific activity; see, for instance [34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%