1988
DOI: 10.3109/17453678809149382
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Displacement in femoral neck fractures: A numerical analysis of 200 fractures

Abstract: We measured the proximal-distal and anterior-posterior displacement of the femoral head in 200 femoral neck fractures. The numerical data were compared with the Garden classification. The average displacement of the Stages I and II fractures were almost equal. Moreover, the displacement of the Stage III fractures did not differ from the displacement of the Stage IV fractures. The Garden Stages I and II fractures displayed a more posterior position of the femoral head than did the normal hips. The femoral heads… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This study provides evidence of the usefulness of classifying the fractures as being undisplaced or moderately displaced. Previous studies have shown that the Garden classification system is unreliable (Eliasson et al 1988, Frandsen et al 1988, Thomsen et al 1996, Bjorgul and Reikeras 2002, but the interobserver reliability may be acceptable when distinguishing between displaced and undisplaced fractures (Eliasson et al 1988, Frandsen et al 1988, Thomsen et al 1996, Bjorgul and Reikeras 2002. The significant difference in healing complications in our study indicates that moderately displaced fractures behave differently from undisplaced fractures.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 36%
“…This study provides evidence of the usefulness of classifying the fractures as being undisplaced or moderately displaced. Previous studies have shown that the Garden classification system is unreliable (Eliasson et al 1988, Frandsen et al 1988, Thomsen et al 1996, Bjorgul and Reikeras 2002, but the interobserver reliability may be acceptable when distinguishing between displaced and undisplaced fractures (Eliasson et al 1988, Frandsen et al 1988, Thomsen et al 1996, Bjorgul and Reikeras 2002. The significant difference in healing complications in our study indicates that moderately displaced fractures behave differently from undisplaced fractures.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 36%
“…We have previously measured the preoperative displacement of femoral neck fractures in the proximaldistal and anteroposterior directions (Eliasson et al 1988). Meaningful differences were found only if the Garden (1961) classification was condensed to two groups; one consisting of Stages I and TI (undisplaced fractures) and the other of Stages III and IV (displaced fractures).…”
Section: Redisplacement Of Nailed Femoral Neck Fractures 4-year Follomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preoperatively, passive range of motion and Trendelenburg's sign were recorded, and the articulo-trochanteric distance on frontal radiographs was measured according to Edgren (Edgren 1965, Gage and Cary 1980, Eliasson et al 1988). …”
Section: Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%