2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsg.2006.03.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Displacement-length scaling relations for faults on the terrestrial planets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
68
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
11
68
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Quantifying the relationship between maximum displacement and length (D max /L) for faults and joints supports studies of deformation on planetary surfaces by providing insight into fracture interaction, population strain, and stratigraphic restriction (e.g., Schultz et al, 2006Schultz et al, , 2008bSchultz et al, , 2010. Measurements of the displacements and lengths of fractures on planetary surfaces with sufficient accuracy for detailed D max /L scaling analyses had been available in Fig.…”
Section: Displacement-length Scaling On Marsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Quantifying the relationship between maximum displacement and length (D max /L) for faults and joints supports studies of deformation on planetary surfaces by providing insight into fracture interaction, population strain, and stratigraphic restriction (e.g., Schultz et al, 2006Schultz et al, , 2008bSchultz et al, , 2010. Measurements of the displacements and lengths of fractures on planetary surfaces with sufficient accuracy for detailed D max /L scaling analyses had been available in Fig.…”
Section: Displacement-length Scaling On Marsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…[12] Tectonic normal faults are widely considered to follow a simple scaling relationship between maximum displacement and maximum dimension [Cowie and Scholz, 1992;Schultz et al, 2006]. For comparison, we plot the maximum throw d versus fault height H in Figure 2 for a collection of 629 faults in polygonal systems worldwide (Note: height H is measured in the vertical direction).…”
Section: Field Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compilation of data from a variety of settings and different types of faults [39][40][41][42], suggests that there are predictable scaling relationships between the length of a fault (L) and the maximum displacement along it (D), but that these relationships vary between different settings and, perhaps, different types of faults. However, the compiled data suggest that D/L relationships have the general form:…”
Section: Displacement-length Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 99%