Displaying fairness while delivering bad news: Testing the effectiveness of organizational bad news training in the layoff context.

Abstract

Although giving bad news at work is a stressful experience, managers are often underprepared for this challenging task. As a solution, we introduce organizational bad news training that integrates (a) principles of delivering bad news from the context of health care (i.e., bad news delivery component), and (b) principles of organizational justice theory (i.e., fairness component). We argue that both the formal and fair delivery of bad news at work can be enhanced with the help of training to mitigate distress both for the messenger and the recipient. We tested the effectiveness of training for the delivery of a layoff as a typical bad news event at work. In 2 studies, we compared the performance of a training group (receiving both components of training) with that of a control group (Study 1, Study 2) and a basics group (receiving the bad news delivery component only; Study 2) during a simulated dismissal notification meeting. In general, the results supported our hypotheses: Training improved the formal delivery of bad news and predicted indicators of procedural fairness during the conversation in both studies. In Study 2, we also considered layoff victims' negativity after the layoff and found that training significantly reduced negative responses. This relationship was fully mediated by layoff victims' fairness perceptions. Despite preparation, however, giving bad news remained a challenging task in both studies. In summary, we recommend that organizations provide managers with organizational bad news training in order to promote professional and fair bad news conversations at work. (PsycINFO Database Record

Organizational Justice, Project Performance, and the Mediating Effects of Key Success Factors

“…Akintoye, McIntosh, and Fitzgerald (2000), Akintoye and Main (2007) and Jha and Iyer (2007) emphasise in their research that commitment is a key factor for the successful project delivery and some studies related to organisational justice suggest that distributive, procedural and interactional justice predict organizational commitment (Allen & Meyer, 1990;Jason A. Colquitt et al, 2001;Folger & Konovsky, 1989). The same is applicable for conflict management which is an antecedent to project performance (Chan et al, 2004) and it has been suggested in prior research that organisational justice can be useful in difficult conversation or in delivering bad news (Lavelle, Folger, & Manegold, 2016;Richter, König, Koppermann, & Schilling, 2016).…”

Explaining individuals' justification of layoffs

“…Organizations and managers therefore need to be aware of the interpersonal and moral challenges of implementing layoffs routinely both for layoff victims and layoff agents. In line with this, recent research has demonstrated that managers can be trained to deliver the bad news of a layoff in a professional and fair way (Richter, König, Koppermann, & Schilling, ).…”

Restructured frame‐of‐reference training improves rating accuracy

“…Business leaders and practitioners can use this restructured method to improve the quality of ratings. Furthermore, the same basic method (i.e., having trainees emulate a role model rather than modify their own behavior based on a trainer's feedback) of restructured FOR training can also be applied to other types of training, such as teamwork skills (Hughes et al, ), news delivery (Richter, König, Koppermann, & Schilling, ), managerial decision‐making (Goodman & Wood, ), and principles regarding effective and ineffective teamwork (Smith‐Jentsch, Campbell, Milanovich, & Reynolds, ).…”