1997
DOI: 10.1080/05568649709506564
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dispositional Essentialism: Alive and Well

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…And thus we end up with the sort of "Tinkertoy" ontology that we have been discussing, a n ontology t h a t understands the world in terms of things and their properties standing in relations to things and their properties and within which dispositions are seen as, at best, a kind of second-class citizen. [21][22] Notes l See, for example, Weissman 1965, Mellor 1974, Fetzer 1977, a number of t h e papers in Tuomela 1978, Tiles 1985, and Thompson 1988 See, for example, Armstrong, Martin, and Place 1996, Miiller 1997-and the articles following, especially, Ham6 1997and Cart-Wright 1997-Anderson 1997, Mumford 1998, Molnar 1999, and Mellor 2000. Armstrong (1997) notes that the term 'disposition' is most naturally applied to the passive powers-rather than to t h e active powers-of a particular thing, although contemporary philosophical usage does not always abide by this.…”
Section: Pessimistic Denouementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And thus we end up with the sort of "Tinkertoy" ontology that we have been discussing, a n ontology t h a t understands the world in terms of things and their properties standing in relations to things and their properties and within which dispositions are seen as, at best, a kind of second-class citizen. [21][22] Notes l See, for example, Weissman 1965, Mellor 1974, Fetzer 1977, a number of t h e papers in Tuomela 1978, Tiles 1985, and Thompson 1988 See, for example, Armstrong, Martin, and Place 1996, Miiller 1997-and the articles following, especially, Ham6 1997and Cart-Wright 1997-Anderson 1997, Mumford 1998, Molnar 1999, and Mellor 2000. Armstrong (1997) notes that the term 'disposition' is most naturally applied to the passive powers-rather than to t h e active powers-of a particular thing, although contemporary philosophical usage does not always abide by this.…”
Section: Pessimistic Denouementmentioning
confidence: 99%