2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2010.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disproportion fœto-pelvienne et radiopelvimétrie

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
5
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is not consistent with previous studies, in which pelvimetry was found to be useful only in the case of breech presentation [27,28,29]. Pelvic scanning should be limited to breech presentations, because it increases the likelihood of caesarean section in cephalic presentations [5].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…This is not consistent with previous studies, in which pelvimetry was found to be useful only in the case of breech presentation [27,28,29]. Pelvic scanning should be limited to breech presentations, because it increases the likelihood of caesarean section in cephalic presentations [5].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…In our study, the Magnin index was less than 21 in 28.89%, between 21 and 23 in 26.67% and greater than 23 in 44.44% whereas a French study found 55.5% of unfavorable prognosis according to the Magnin index (<23 cm) [ 11 ]. However, our result is close to that of Christian et al, who found 33.33% of narrowed pelvis [ 12 ] but widely different than that obtained by Adjenou et al.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 60%
“…Among the caesarized patients, 54.17% had a Magnin index of less than 21 and 37.5% had between 21 and 23. No patient gives birth by vaginal delivery with a Magnin index below 21, as in the study of Frémondière and Fournie [ 11 ], which would authenticate the importance of this index in the prognosis of childbirth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In a previous study, the reliability of the fetal-pelvic index was confirmed as having high sensitivity and specificity ratios for determining the mode of delivery [ 23 ]. In some hospitals, CPD can be conflated with dystocia related to uterine activity, thus complicating the determination of the prevalence of true CPD [ 24 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%