1994
DOI: 10.1021/ef00043a003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disproportional ferric sulfide catalysts for coal liquefaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is evidenced by the increase in the gas yield at higher reaction times (Figure 7). A similar trend in gas yield increment and solid yield reductions at higher reaction times was observed by Yan et al during the HTL of Sugar cane bagasse [26], though the biomass feedstocks are different, the HTL reaction mechanisms are largely the same. The steady increase in gas yield is attributed to the increasing decomposition of the solid residue and biocrude oil into the gaseous phase at higher reaction times.…”
Section: Effect Of Reaction Time and Mnpssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is evidenced by the increase in the gas yield at higher reaction times (Figure 7). A similar trend in gas yield increment and solid yield reductions at higher reaction times was observed by Yan et al during the HTL of Sugar cane bagasse [26], though the biomass feedstocks are different, the HTL reaction mechanisms are largely the same. The steady increase in gas yield is attributed to the increasing decomposition of the solid residue and biocrude oil into the gaseous phase at higher reaction times.…”
Section: Effect Of Reaction Time and Mnpssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The initial increase in biocrude yield with temperature is attributed to an increased decomposition and depolymerization of biomass into smaller compounds [28]. The reduction in biocrude yield beyond the peak temperature is attributed to the Boudouard reactions and the secondary reactions which are activated at higher temperatures [26] [29]. The increase in gas yields at higher temperatures as seen in Figure 10(a) confirms the activation of secondary and Boudouard reactions leading to biocrude evaporation into the gas phase.…”
Section: Effect Of Temperaturementioning
confidence: 85%
“…Only HYD occurred; no HYC of the aromatic ring was observed. The products observed from 1-MN were primarily the HYD products of 5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-1methylnaphthalene (5,6,7, and 172,3,4-tetrahydro-l-methylnaphthalene ( 172,3,4-1-HMN). The hydrocracked product, NAP, was the minor product, present at 2 to 3 mol % .…”
Section: Hydrocracking Reactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hydrocracked product, NAP, was the minor product, present at 2 to 3 mol % . Comparison of the product slate when MoNaph was used showed that substantially more of the hydrogenated products were formed yielding 39% 5,6,7,8-1-HMN and 25% 1,2,3,4-1-HMN7 compared to the Fe catalysts where [11][12]6,7, to 5.3% 172,3,4-1-HMN were formed; however, no NAP was produced. For all of the catalysts, the 5,6,7,8-1-HMN isomer was the preferred product.…”
Section: Hydrocracking Reactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The important parameters in coal liquefaction are catalyst type, catalyst concentration, and catalyst usage method. To achieve a higher conversion rate of both total and light (soluble in hexane) liquid product, various researches have been carried on previously (Artok et al, 1992;Bacaud et al, 1994;Baldwin and Vinciguerra, 1983;Dadyburjor et al, 1994;Guin et al, 1980;Hu et al, 2002;Kamiya et al, 1988;Karaca, 1998;Sharma et al, 1996;Warzinski et al, 1996;Watanabe et al, 1984;Zhang et al, 2002). Studies of catalytically accomplished coal liquefaction are generally based on determination of appropriate catalysts (metal oxides, metal salts, metal sulphates) and accelerator materials soluble in water and oil (Karaca, 1998).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%