1994
DOI: 10.1210/jcem.79.6.7989457
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disproportionately elevated proinsulin levels precede the onset of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in siblings with low first phase insulin responses. The Childhood Diabetes in Finland Study Group.

Abstract: The objective of this study was to test whether levels of proinsulin immunoreactivity (PIM) relative to those of insulin immunoreactivity (IRI) or C-peptide are changed and related to subclinical beta-cell dysfunction in siblings of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) patients. Twenty-three siblings, previously found positive for islet cell antibodies and/or insulin autoantibodies, were divided into 2 groups according to their first phase insulin response (FPIR) to i.v. glucose tolerance tests (IVGTTs) … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
24
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Islet cell antibodies (ICA) have been observed to be associated with increased PIM concentrations (9), but most of the first-degree relatives in previous studies tested negative for ICA (1,2,9). However, in some siblings we found increased PIM concentrations or PIM/C-peptide ratios associated with decreased B cell function and later progression to IDDM (10).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Islet cell antibodies (ICA) have been observed to be associated with increased PIM concentrations (9), but most of the first-degree relatives in previous studies tested negative for ICA (1,2,9). However, in some siblings we found increased PIM concentrations or PIM/C-peptide ratios associated with decreased B cell function and later progression to IDDM (10).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Age, gender, BMI and 5′ INS genotype (K. Decochez, unpublished)-all known to influence the risk of diabetes [3,18,20,22]could not improve the prediction of diabetes so far in this group, but demonstration of their possible added value would require follow-up of larger study groups for longer periods. Disease prediction may further benefit from the assessment of the persistence of antibodies, changes in antibody levels and SDS-BMI over time and, most likely, from the repeated assessment of beta cell function and insulin resistance [22,24,[37][38][39][40][41][42]. The most standardised functional tests (intravenous glucose tolerance test, clamps) are, however, more difficult to implement on a larger scale in non-diabetic risk groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This underlines the important point that the proinsulin:insulin ratio is not a reliable index of beta-cell function under conditions of altered hepatic insulin clearance, and under such circumstances, the proinsulin:C-peptide ratio should be used. Certainly a close and inverse relationship has been demonstrated between the proinsulin:C-peptide ratio and first phase insulin secretion as an index of beta-cell function [40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%