2014
DOI: 10.1021/la501074x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disrupting Admicelle Formation and Preventing Surfactant Adsorption on Metal Oxide Surfaces Using Sacrificial Polyelectrolytes

Abstract: The adsorption of anionic, cationic, and nonionic surfactants was measured on high-surface area silica and alumina nanoparticles when in the presence of the proposed polyelectrolyte sacrificial agents. Surfactant adsorption was characterized using two types of adsorption isotherms: one with constant polymer concentration and varying surfactant concentration, and another with a varying polymer concentration and constant surfactant concentration. Polystyrenesulfonate and Polydiallyl dimethylammonium chloride wer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The paper [17] also indicated that the effect of added SDS and showed that SDS was preferentially adsorbed from both simultaneous and sequential adsorptions so that in all cases SDS displaces preadsorbed PSS from the solid surface. Very recent study demonstrated that the presence of PSS and PDADMAC (polydiallyldimethylammonium chloride) effectively prevented different surfactants adsorption on high surface area alumina and silica by blocking charged adsorption sites [18]. Only PSS appears to irreversibly adsorb onto metal oxides surface because of multisite adsorption and kinetic limitations while the adsorption of surfactant is almost completely prevented at concentration higher than critical micelle concentration (CMC).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The paper [17] also indicated that the effect of added SDS and showed that SDS was preferentially adsorbed from both simultaneous and sequential adsorptions so that in all cases SDS displaces preadsorbed PSS from the solid surface. Very recent study demonstrated that the presence of PSS and PDADMAC (polydiallyldimethylammonium chloride) effectively prevented different surfactants adsorption on high surface area alumina and silica by blocking charged adsorption sites [18]. Only PSS appears to irreversibly adsorb onto metal oxides surface because of multisite adsorption and kinetic limitations while the adsorption of surfactant is almost completely prevented at concentration higher than critical micelle concentration (CMC).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second problem is the surfactant adsorption, which could make the surfactant process economically unfeasible. This issue can also be alleviated by using well-documented alkaline solutions (Hirasaki et al 2011) or a recently developed polyelectrolyte based sacrificial agent (ShamsiJazeyi et al 2014a and2014b;Weston et al 2014). The third issue is the dilution effect attributed to the mixing with connate water, which also results in the change in ionic strength.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SAs are thought to be a new additive that can adsorb onto the rock and reduce surfactant adsorption. Application of SAs for enhanced oil recovery (EOR) and hydraulic fracturing operations have been documented in previous studies (Weston et al 2014;ShamsiJazeyi et al 2014a;ShamsiJazeyi et al 2014b;He et al 2015b). Such laboratory tests have reviewed the reduction of surfactant adsorption onto a variety of outcrop minerals, metal oxides, and tight shale formations using the PET-based SAs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%