Disruption in the space–time continuum: why digital ethnography matters

Abstract

There is increasing interest in the use of ethnography as a qualitative research approach to explore, in depth, issues of culture in health professions education (HPE). Our specific focus in this article is incorporating the digital into ethnography. Digital technologies are pervasively and increasingly shaping the way we interact, behave, think, and communicate as health professions educators and learners. Understanding the contemporary culture(s) of HPE thus means paying attention to what goes on in digital spaces. In this paper, we critically consider some of the potential issues when the field of ethnography exists outside the space time continuum, including the need to engage with theory in research about technology and digital spaces in HPE. After a very brief review of the few HPE studies that have used digital ethnography, we scrutinize what can be gained when ethnography encompasses the digital world, particularly in relation to untangling sociomaterial aspects of HPE. We chart the shifts inherent in conducting ethnographic research within the digital landscape, specifically those related to research field, the role of the researcher and ethical issues. We then use two examples to illustrate possible HPE research questions and potential strategies for using digital ethnography to answer those questions: using digital tools in the conduct of an ethnographic study and how to conduct an ethnography of a digital space. We conclude that acknowledging the pervasiveness of technologies in the design, delivery and experiences of HPE opens up new research questions which can be addressed by embracing the digital in ethnography.

Bytes and Beliefs: Understanding Cultural Dynamics Through Digital Ethnography

“…Ritter (2021) explores the qualitative approach to understanding interfaces, aligning with this theme by examining the way conflicts play out in digital environments. Cleland and MacLeod (2022) underscore the importance of digital ethnography in understanding disruptions in the space-time continuum, linking directly to the theme of conflict and negotiation.…”

Bytes and Beliefs: Understanding Cultural Dynamics Through Digital Ethnography

“…Ritter (2021) explores the qualitative approach to understanding interfaces, aligning with this theme by examining the way conflicts play out in digital environments. Cleland and MacLeod (2022) underscore the importance of digital ethnography in understanding disruptions in the space-time continuum, linking directly to the theme of conflict and negotiation.…”

Short essay: Current issues in digital ethnography: is all ethnography digital?

“…There are subtleties in what these terms mean. They refer to ethnography seeking to examine the Internet as a space of practice (Duggan, 2017; Cleland and MacLeod, 2022), but not all digital ethnographers suggest that online and offline practices must be viewed as separate. Indeed, Hine (2020) mentions that online and offline social lives are intimately interconnected.…”