2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.11.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disruption of synaesthesia following TMS of the right posterior parietal cortex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
72
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
5
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, 5 out of 6 neuroanatomical studies on developmental grapheme-color synesthesia report parietal results. Given this state of affairs and TMS evidence (Esterman et al 2007;Muggleton et al 2007;Rothen et al 2010), parietal results are consistent enough to define this region (IPS) as a crucial area in grapheme-color synesthesia.…”
Section: The Canonical Regions Of Interestmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, 5 out of 6 neuroanatomical studies on developmental grapheme-color synesthesia report parietal results. Given this state of affairs and TMS evidence (Esterman et al 2007;Muggleton et al 2007;Rothen et al 2010), parietal results are consistent enough to define this region (IPS) as a crucial area in grapheme-color synesthesia.…”
Section: The Canonical Regions Of Interestmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The other focus of interest for anatomical investigation has been the intraparietal sulcus (IPS), which is believed to mediate the hyperbinding of the inducer (e.g., a grapheme) and the concurrent (e.g., one specific color). The left IPS has shown differential activation in grapheme-color functional studies (van Leeuwen et al 2011;Weiss et al 2005), whereas stimulation of the right IPS with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) resulted in the disruption of the Synesthetic Stroop Effect (Esterman et al 2007;Muggleton et al 2007;Rothen et al 2010). Regarding neuroanatomical data, only 2 out of 4 studies of gray matter (GM) reported variations in the FG (Jancke et al 2009;Weiss and Fink 2009) and/ or the IPS (Rouw and Scholte 2010;Weiss and Fink 2009) (for a summary of published data on the neuroanatomy of developmental grapheme-color synesthesia, see Supplementary Material -Introduction: Table 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have reported increased BOLD-MRI activation in parietal cortex during synesthesia (Paulesu et al, 1995;Nunn et al, 2002;Steven et al, 2006). Furthermore, interference related to synesthetic experience has been found to diminish after applying transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to the superior parietal cortex (Esterman et al, 2006;Muggleton et al, 2007). The role of the parietal lobe in synesthesia has been related to its function in cross-sensory integration or "binding," multimodal associations, and multimodal integratory attention (e.g., Muggleton et al, 2007;Robertson, 2003).…”
Section: Shared Mechanisms: Grapheme-color Synesthetes Compared With mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, projector synesthetes were contrasted with associator synesthetes. We hypothesized that both shared mechanisms [parietal processes crucial to generating the synesthetic experience (Esterman et al, 2006;Muggleton et al, 2007)] and distinct mechanisms underlie these two subtypes of grapheme-color synesthesia. On the one hand, synesthesia has been found related to modality-specific brain areas (Nunn et al, 2002;Hubbard et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most important of these are anterior lingual gyrus regions [9,44] involved in color naming and categorization, and intraparietal sulcus regions [9,10,45] involved in attention, binding and multisensory processes. Especially given the converging evidence from TMS studies [36,46] the role of parietal cortex in the genesis of synesthesia needs to be taken quite seriously.…”
Section: Summary and Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%