1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf00588054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disruption of the representativeness heuristic: Can we be perturbed into using correct probabilistic reasoning?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, one response option would contain three heads and three tails (e.g., HTHTTH), while the second choice would contain five heads and one tail (e.g., HHHHHT). While providing options with a different ratio "toes the line" in terms of research from the fields of psychology and mathematics education, Cox and Mouw (1992) found disruption of one aspect of the representativeness heuristic, such as the appearance of randomness, did not exclude the population ratio being used as a clue. As such, while previous research has addressed sequences with a disparate number of heads and tails, this study examines responses from students when all choices presented contain the same ratio of heads to tails.…”
Section: Task Constructionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, one response option would contain three heads and three tails (e.g., HTHTTH), while the second choice would contain five heads and one tail (e.g., HHHHHT). While providing options with a different ratio "toes the line" in terms of research from the fields of psychology and mathematics education, Cox and Mouw (1992) found disruption of one aspect of the representativeness heuristic, such as the appearance of randomness, did not exclude the population ratio being used as a clue. As such, while previous research has addressed sequences with a disparate number of heads and tails, this study examines responses from students when all choices presented contain the same ratio of heads to tails.…”
Section: Task Constructionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A number of researchers in mathematics education (Batanero, Green, & Serrano, 1998;Batanero & Serrano, 1999;Borovcnik & Bentz, 1991;Cox & Mouw, 1992;Hirsch & O'Donnell, 2001;Rubel, 2006Rubel, , 2007 have continued to work with the CLT. Moreover, certain researchers (Konold, 1989(Konold, , 1991(Konold, , 1995Konold, Pollatsek, Well, Hendrickson & Lipson, 1991;Konold, Pollatsek, Well, Lohmeier & Lipson, 1993;Shaughnessy, 1977Shaughnessy, , 1981 have addressed issues associated with the inferential nature of Tversky and Kahneman's research and, as such, have furthered research involving the CLT as well as the task itself.…”
Section: Mathematics Education Researchmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…There is ample evidence that major misconceptions exist about statistical concepts, and that moves to change these have only been partly successful (e.g., Cox & Mouw, 1992;Gal, 1992;Pollatsek, Lima & Well, 1981). Teachers, it seems, are not exempt from these misconceptions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Questions 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, and 9 use this technique. It was also used by Cox and Mouw (1992) in a related study.…”
Section: Anchoring Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%