2012
DOI: 10.1109/surv.2011.041911.00093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disruption-Tolerant Networking: A Comprehensive Survey on Recent Developments and Persisting Challenges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
181
0
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 303 publications
(186 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
1
181
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…A survey work [23] classified nondeterministic SCF networking into four -disseminationbased, context-based, fixed infrastructure-based, and mobile infrastructure-based. A more comprehensive classification can be found in another survey paper [16].…”
Section: Store-carry-forward Message Relayingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A survey work [23] classified nondeterministic SCF networking into four -disseminationbased, context-based, fixed infrastructure-based, and mobile infrastructure-based. A more comprehensive classification can be found in another survey paper [16].…”
Section: Store-carry-forward Message Relayingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such extreme conditions occur when the normal behavior of existing communication infrastructures is interrupted aftermath of a disaster or a user occasionally meets another device and decides to exchange data by using a direct wireless link. In the literature, such kinds of network scenarios are classified as Delay-and Disruption-Tolerant Networks (DTNs) [28]. In general, DTNs can be used to support both interplanetary and terrestrial communications.…”
Section: Icn For Disaster Management and Children Safetymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The opportunistic networks are an important class of DTNs [21] in which contacts appear opportunistically without any prior information. They cover many similar aspects of delay tolerant networks, which can be characterised by intermittent connectivity, frequent end-to-end path disruption and topology changes.…”
Section: Evolutions Of Multi-hop Ad-hoc Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%