2013
DOI: 10.1080/14703297.2013.866330
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disruptive conduct: the impact of disruptive technologies on social relations in higher education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Incorporating new technologies in teaching and learning approaches involves a redefinition of the teaching approach and curriculum, and takes into account the 'networked' model, based on multidirectional flows of information, which is constantly adapted. In addition, there is a need to address the pedagogic usage of technology, instead of implementing technology without a priori thinking on how to fit it in a particular pedagogy [8][9][10][11][12].…”
Section: What Are Some Of the Promising Modes Of Education Provision mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incorporating new technologies in teaching and learning approaches involves a redefinition of the teaching approach and curriculum, and takes into account the 'networked' model, based on multidirectional flows of information, which is constantly adapted. In addition, there is a need to address the pedagogic usage of technology, instead of implementing technology without a priori thinking on how to fit it in a particular pedagogy [8][9][10][11][12].…”
Section: What Are Some Of the Promising Modes Of Education Provision mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also include changes in teaching methods, curricula and programmes, which, for example, allow the institution to reach a different student demographic, for example, through partnerships outside of the university. And, as highlighted by the literature, new technologies need to be incorporated in pedagogic usage of technology, rather 102 / 217 than being implemented without a priori purpose (Bayne & Ross 2014;Brennan et al 2014;Flavin 2013). …”
Section: Answers Q1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Lack of embeddedness of pedagogical approaches in technology (Flavin 2013)  Lack of flexibility and adaptability in institutions (Istance 2011)  Skills shortage (Freeman 2012;Jones et al 2012)  Student expectations (Jaldemark & Lindberg 2013) In order to help us shape the project recommendations (research question Q4, Which recommendations can be issued regarding higher education management in innovative provision? ), the review addressed the state of the literature regarding the role of governance and management in innovation.…”
Section: Barriers To and Drivers Of The Innovation Process Drivers Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations