Disruptive technology roadmaps

Kostoff, Ronald N.; Boylan, Robert; Simons, Gene R.

doi:10.1016/s0040-1625(03)00048-9

Cited by 336 publications

(126 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

111

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…External involvement in the innovation process has also been identified in previous studies as an essential requirement for an improved innovation capability [74], [100], [2], [3], [13], [73], [25], [50]. This includes the involvement of clients, suppliers, partners, and other external stakeholders in various activities of the innovation process.…”

Section: Review Of Literature On Innovation Capability Requirementsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The need to support and encourage innovative behaviour, demonstrate commitment towards innovation, acknowledge the important role of people in innovation, and develop, support, and encourage innovation champions within the organisation [2], [49], [74], [100], [3], [62], [25], [48], [50].…”

Section: Review Of Literature On Innovation Capability Requirementsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This includes the involvement of clients, suppliers, partners, and other external stakeholders in various activities of the innovation process. Good practices include facilitating and enabling good communication with external stakeholders [74], [25], [50], building relationships with clients, suppliers, and partners [74], [3], interacting with clients in order to identify their needs, problems, and ideas, tapping into their explicit knowledge [2], [13], and using their requirements to drive initiatives.…”

Section: Review Of Literature On Innovation Capability Requirementsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Organisations also need to have a future orientation and take a longer-term view of opportunities [83], [5], [50], [73], [32], [70]. Good practices include both wide and deep scanning of different and related environments to identify opportunities [83], [73], [50], [32], identifying the future technology developments and timelines of such technologies (technology roadmapping) [50], and relating opportunities to core competencies and resources [83].…”

Section: Review Of Literature On Innovation Capability Requirementsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Architecting the Enterprise Towards Enhanced Innovation Capability

Louw¹,

Schutte²,

Preez³

et al. 2017

SAJIE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In today's competitive environment, organisations cannot afford to focus only on effectiveness and efficiencies -they also need to innovate. This is evident from most literature sources on innovation. Innovation topics, such as the innovation process and the drivers, barriers, principles, and success factors for innovation, have received a lot of attention in the literature. What is still lacking, however, is a consolidated view of the core requirements for building an innovation capability within an organisation. This paper lays the foundation for an innovation capability reference architecture by identifying those innovation success factors or requirements described in the literature, and consolidating and structuring it within an easy-to-use enterprise architecture framework. OPSOMMINGDie meeste literatuurbronne wat handel oor innovasie stem saam dat in vandag se mededingende omgewing ondernemings nie kan bekostig om net op doeltreffendheid en effektiwiteit te fokus niehulle moet ook innoveer. Innovasieonderwerpe soos die innovasieproses, sowel as die drywers, struikelblokke, beginsels en suksesfaktore vir innovasie geniet ook heelwat aandag in die literatuur. Daar ontbreek egter nog steeds 'n gekonsolideerde oorsig van die kern vereistes vir die ontwikkeling van 'n innovasie vermoë in ondernemings. Hierdie artikel lê die grondslag vir 'n innovasievermoë verwysingsargitektuur deur die innovasie suksesfaktore of vereistes soos bespreek in die literatuur te identifiseer, en dan te konsolideer en te struktureer in 'n maklik bruikbare ondernemingsverwysingsargitektuur.

show abstract

Section: Review Of Literature On Innovation Capability Requirementsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Review Of Literature On Innovation Capability Requirementsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Review Of Literature On Innovation Capability Requirementsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Review Of Literature On Innovation Capability Requirementsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Architecting the Enterprise Towards Enhanced Innovation Capability

Louw¹,

Schutte²,

Preez³

et al. 2017

SAJIE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…• выход компании на новые рынки, со здание радикальных и подрывных ин новаций [Walsh, 2004;Kostoff, Boylan, Simons, 2004;Tierney, Hermina, Walsh, 2013]; • реализацию инновационных стратегий и обеспечение согласованности действий на всех уровнях организации [Groen veld, 1997;McCarthy, 2003;Wells et al, 2004;Abe et al, 2009]; • развитие инновационной культуры и усиление коммуникаций [Ma, Liu, Na kamori, 2006;Phaal, 2015]. Необходимо отметить, что до сих пор не сформировалось общепринятого универ сального понятия «технологические до рож ные карты» (примеры см.…”

Section: технологические дорожные карты: ключевые идеи для управленияunclassified

Technology Roadmaps: Implementation of Innovation Management in Large Companies

Юрьевна¹

2017

RMJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Scientific evolutionary pathways: Identifying and visualizing relationships for scientific topics

Zhang

Zhu

et al. 2017

Asso for Info Science & Tech

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Whereas traditional science maps emphasize citation statistics and static relationships, this paper presents a term-based method to identify and visualize the evolutionary pathways of scientific topics in a series of time slices. First, we create a data preprocessing model for accurate term cleaning, consolidating, and clustering. Then we construct a simulated data streaming function and introduce a learning process to train a relationship identification function to adapt to changing environments in real time, where relationships of topic evolution, fusion, death, and novelty are identified. The main result of the method is a map of scientific evolutionary pathways. The visual routines provide a way to indicate the interactions among scientific subjects and a version in a series of time slices helps further illustrate such evolutionary pathways in detail. The detailed outline offers sufficient statistical information to delve into scientific topics and routines and then helps address meaningful insights with the assistance of expert knowledge. This empirical study focuses on scientific proposals granted by the United States National Science Foundation, and demonstrates the feasibility and reliability. Our method could be widely applied to a range of science, technology, and innovation policy research, and offer insight into the evolutionary pathways of scientific activities.

show abstract

Disruptive technology roadmaps

Cited by 336 publications

References 28 publications

Architecting the Enterprise Towards Enhanced Innovation Capability

Architecting the Enterprise Towards Enhanced Innovation Capability

Technology Roadmaps: Implementation of Innovation Management in Large Companies

Scientific evolutionary pathways: Identifying and visualizing relationships for scientific topics

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About