2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.repc.2017.06.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disseção coronária espontânea – To stent or not to stent that is the question

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, there are no established guidelines for the management of SCAD in the literature [ 1 ]. Management should be individualized depending upon clinical presentation and the concomitant angiographic findings and range from conservative medical management to emergent revascularization with PCI or CABG [ 11 ]. Revascularization is a feasible option in patients with unstable hemodynamics, arrhythmias such as ventricular tachycardia (VT) and/or fibrillation, recurrent or persistent chest pain indicative of ongoing ischemia, and left main CAD [ 11 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To date, there are no established guidelines for the management of SCAD in the literature [ 1 ]. Management should be individualized depending upon clinical presentation and the concomitant angiographic findings and range from conservative medical management to emergent revascularization with PCI or CABG [ 11 ]. Revascularization is a feasible option in patients with unstable hemodynamics, arrhythmias such as ventricular tachycardia (VT) and/or fibrillation, recurrent or persistent chest pain indicative of ongoing ischemia, and left main CAD [ 11 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Management should be individualized depending upon clinical presentation and the concomitant angiographic findings and range from conservative medical management to emergent revascularization with PCI or CABG [ 11 ]. Revascularization is a feasible option in patients with unstable hemodynamics, arrhythmias such as ventricular tachycardia (VT) and/or fibrillation, recurrent or persistent chest pain indicative of ongoing ischemia, and left main CAD [ 11 ]. Recent observational studies suggested that medical management is recommended in stable SCAD patients as there have been reported high rates of angiographic healing of coronary dissection and favorable short-term outcomes [ 12 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1] The optimal treatment of SCAD is unclear and ranges from conservative therapy to emergency revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting. [9,10] Patients who present with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and have either left main dissection or symptoms of continued ischemia or hemodynamic instability should be referred for emergent revascularization, as occurred in the patient presented. [10][11][12] In stable patients without the above mentioned features, long-term management with aspirin, beta blockers, and one year of dual antiplatelet therapy has been shown to lower the risk of recurrent SCAD (Figure 5).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9,10] Patients who present with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and have either left main dissection or symptoms of continued ischemia or hemodynamic instability should be referred for emergent revascularization, as occurred in the patient presented. [10][11][12] In stable patients without the above mentioned features, long-term management with aspirin, beta blockers, and one year of dual antiplatelet therapy has been shown to lower the risk of recurrent SCAD (Figure 5). [2] Prospective randomized studies are needed to further elucidate the optimal treatment modality in patients with SCAD, particularly those in the peripartum period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%