2014
DOI: 10.4103/0976-3147.140023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dissecting aneurysm of the posterior cerebral artery: Defining the role of deliberate surgical proximal artery occlusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most common presentation is subarachnoid hemorrhage with headache and neurological deficits that defer depending on the involved segments of the PCA 2,10,16) . In general, PCA aneurysms arise mostly on P1 or at the P1-2 junction 8,9) , but dissecting aneurysms usually involve P2 or P2-3 segments 10,16) ; therefore, associated neurologic deficits include memory impairment, oculomotor palsy, visual disturbance (homonymous hemianopsia) and sometimes hemiparesis due to mass effect 2) . Acute hydrocephalus should be a concern when presented because it aggravates mental deterioration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most common presentation is subarachnoid hemorrhage with headache and neurological deficits that defer depending on the involved segments of the PCA 2,10,16) . In general, PCA aneurysms arise mostly on P1 or at the P1-2 junction 8,9) , but dissecting aneurysms usually involve P2 or P2-3 segments 10,16) ; therefore, associated neurologic deficits include memory impairment, oculomotor palsy, visual disturbance (homonymous hemianopsia) and sometimes hemiparesis due to mass effect 2) . Acute hydrocephalus should be a concern when presented because it aggravates mental deterioration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous articles have shown that, with proper management, almost all P2-3 segment dissecting aneurysm cases had favorable clinical outcomes (Table 1) 1,3,[5][6][7][8][9]12,14,16) . The difference of the present cases from those previously published is clinical outcome (mRS 5 and 6) despite complete occlusion of the aneurysm during the acute period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%