2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2020.113116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dissecting complex nanoparticle heterostructures via multimodal data fusion with aberration-corrected STEM spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data for these composite images were extracted from an unsupervised empirical model derived from the combination of three simultaneously acquired hyperspectral datacubes containing low-loss EELS, core-loss EELS, and EDX. These three data sets were combined using a technique known as data fusion prior to variance consolidation via orthogonalization of the joint covariance matrix, as described by Thersleff et al , More details on the analysis and the compositional maps (Figure S5) without treatment are provided in the Supporting Information.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The data for these composite images were extracted from an unsupervised empirical model derived from the combination of three simultaneously acquired hyperspectral datacubes containing low-loss EELS, core-loss EELS, and EDX. These three data sets were combined using a technique known as data fusion prior to variance consolidation via orthogonalization of the joint covariance matrix, as described by Thersleff et al , More details on the analysis and the compositional maps (Figure S5) without treatment are provided in the Supporting Information.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data for these composite images were extracted from an unsupervised empirical model derived from the combination of three simultaneously acquired hyperspectral datacubes containing low-loss EELS, core-loss EELS, and EDX. These three data sets were combined using a technique known as data fusion prior to variance consolidation via orthogonalization of the joint covariance matrix, as described by Thersleff et al 36,37 More details on the analysis and the compositional maps (Figure S5) without treatment are provided in the Supporting Information. This was further verified by TEM images for all samples (Figure S1a), where the amorphous nanostructured SiO 2 dielectric spacer was observed that separated the spherical silver nanoparticles within each aggregate and prevented them from coalescing during their flame synthesis.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, it is worth noting that organizing and conducting in-situ measurements is exceptionally difficult, either for ethical motivations (e.g., collecting biomedical samples from clinical trials) or for practical reasons (e.g. labeling environmental effects on large land and sea areas) [4], [5], [7]. Thus, when scarce training sets (either in terms of quantity or quality of the samples) are available, the analysis can be affected by overfitting on one hand, or low accuracy on the other [3], [11].…”
Section: Motivation and Main Contributions Of This Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EELS and EDX data were treated following the data-fusion procedures outlined in our recent work as well as the references. 41 ■ RESULTS AND DISCUSSION XPS Analysis. A low energy-resolution survey spectrum of the petrol engine sample revealed the presence of the following elements: carbon, fluorine, oxygen, nitrogen, calcium, phosphorus, sulfur, and zinc (Figure 2a).…”
Section: ■ Experimental Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A schematic of this approach is presented in Figure 4 with further details provided in our recent work. 41 A core-loss EELS and coregistered EDX datablock are first fused along their energy dimensions using weighted concatenation, where the weight of the EDX datablock artificially reduces its total spectral variance to be below that of the core-loss EELS. The fused datablock is then decomposed using principle component analysis (PCA).…”
Section: ■ Experimental Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%