2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2017.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dissecting fiscal multipliers under the fiscal theory of the price level

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This implies that when ρ g = 0, and ρ → 0, we have GSM y M (0) → 1 + ϕ π κσΓ 1 + ϕ π κσ , GSM y M (j) = 0, ∀j ≥ 1. This is the same result as in Woodford (2011) andBeck-Friis andWillems (2017).…”
Section: For Online Publication Appendixsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This implies that when ρ g = 0, and ρ → 0, we have GSM y M (0) → 1 + ϕ π κσΓ 1 + ϕ π κσ , GSM y M (j) = 0, ∀j ≥ 1. This is the same result as in Woodford (2011) andBeck-Friis andWillems (2017).…”
Section: For Online Publication Appendixsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Thus, the government spending multiplier under the fiscal regime is greater than that under the monetary regime. This result can be obtained under the standard Taylor rule without consideration of AIT (Beck-Friis and Willems, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, variations in inflation rate are largely based on the actions of the fiscal authorities in an economy. The FTPL, as embedded in the non-Ricardian policy, seems to have particular relevance for developing economies because they issue domestic currency debt and often lack the fiscal capacity to mobilise the necessary real tax revenues, giving rise to an "active" fiscal authority, while the concerns for capital flows imply that monetary policy tends to be "passive" (Beck-Friis and Willems, 2017). More so because these economies are characterised by large public debt in the funding of fiscal deficits, Blanchard (2004) and Favero and Giavazzi (2004) suggest that an increase in interest rate in an economy with large public debt aimed at controlling inflation within the target range may increase the cost of debt service, debt level, default probability and country premium, which may trigger capital outflows and exchange rate depreciation that would affect inflation expectations and in the end inflation itself.…”
Section: Theoretical Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beck-Friis and Willems (2017) analytically show that in regime F with lump-sum taxes, government spending financed by nominal debt is equivalent to money-financed spending.3 We chooseRotemberg's (1982) mechanism instead ofCalvo's (1983) to reduce the number of state variables required in solving the model nonlinearly.4Traum and Yang (2011) show that when only a short-term debt is included, regime F requires an unusually high degree of price stickiness to reconcile inflation dynamics in data and in an NK model.7©International Monetary Fund. Not for Redistribution…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%