2023
DOI: 10.1038/s41568-023-00568-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dissecting metastasis using preclinical models and methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 244 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is similar to the results of Szczerba et al, who found that depleting neutrophils with Anti Ly6G did not prevent lung metastasis caused by direct intravenous injection of tumor cells . This may be due to the fact that the direct injection of cancer cells into the circulation induces lung metastasis mainly by the rapid trapping of numerous cells within the microvasculature of the lung minutes after injection, which only represents the late phases of the invasion–metastasis cascade and organ colonization but fails to capture the earlier stages of the metastatic process, such as local invasion and intravasation, and does not fully model the normal course of hematogenous spread. , …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This is similar to the results of Szczerba et al, who found that depleting neutrophils with Anti Ly6G did not prevent lung metastasis caused by direct intravenous injection of tumor cells . This may be due to the fact that the direct injection of cancer cells into the circulation induces lung metastasis mainly by the rapid trapping of numerous cells within the microvasculature of the lung minutes after injection, which only represents the late phases of the invasion–metastasis cascade and organ colonization but fails to capture the earlier stages of the metastatic process, such as local invasion and intravasation, and does not fully model the normal course of hematogenous spread. , …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…13 This may be due to the fact that the direct injection of cancer cells into the circulation induces lung metastasis mainly by the rapid trapping of numerous cells within the microvasculature of the lung minutes after injection, which only represents the late phases of the invasion−metastasis cascade and organ colonization but fails to capture the earlier stages of the metastatic process, such as local invasion and intravasation, and does not fully model the normal course of hematogenous spread. 36,38 These findings show that aNEM NPs do not affect primary tumor growth but hold a strong antimetastatic effect in both orthotopic and lymph node metastasis models of 4T1 cancer cells. However, aNEM NPs have only a slightly antimetastatic effect in the intravenous injection of 4T1 cells induced lung metastasis model, suggesting that they are unable to prevent the entrapment and implantation of intravenously injected numerous 4T1 cells in the lung microvasculature.…”
Section: Synthesis and Characterization Of Anem Npsmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Cancer genome sequencing has cataloged somatic alterations at the genome-wide level and identified many putative driver genes 14,15 . However, identifying recurrent genomic alterations does not necessarily reveal their functional importance to cancer growth, and the impact of gene inactivation remains difficult to glean from cancer genome sequencing data alone 1618 . Tumor suppressor gene alterations in particular are diverse and have non-random patterns of co-occurrence, suggesting underlying genetic interactions 14,19–21 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%