Dissecting work commitment: the role of Machiavellianism

Abstract

PurposeThe aim of this paper is to refine the concept of work commitment by proposing a dissociation between self‐related work commitment (namely, employees' career commitment) and other‐related work commitment (pertaining more strongly to others such as team members or supervisors). The dissociation is demonstrated empirically through the differential predictive validity of Machiavellianism, which holds when the influence of broad personality dimensions is controlled for.Design/methodology/approachPersonality characteristics (Machiavellianism and the six factors of the HEXACO model of personality) as well as organizational, supervisor, team, and career commitment of 154 employees were assessed via self‐reports.FindingsResults support the hypotheses that Machiavellianism is related positively to self‐related work commitment (career commitment) and negatively to other‐related work commitment (organizational, supervisor, and team commitment), and explains unique variance in all criteria above the six broad dimensions of personality.Originality/valueAlthough meta‐analyses have indicated strong overlaps between diverse work commitment foci, it is argued and shown that there are core differences between self‐related career commitment and other‐related commitment foci. Additionally, Machiavellianism as well as the HEXACO dimensions are investigated as predictors of work commitment foci for the first time.

How innovative is your employee? The role of employee and supervisor Dark Triad personality traits in supervisor perceptions of employee innovative behavior

“…For instance, it has been found that narcissistic individuals are more likely to emerge as leaders and are also perceived to be more effective as leaders (Brunell et al, 2008;Nevicka, Ten Velden et al, 2011), that psychopathy in managers is positively associated with ratings of charisma and presentation style (Babiak, Neumann, & Hare, 2010), and that Machiavellianism in employees is positively related to career commitment (Zettler, Friedrich, & Hilbir, 2010). These findings suggest that having these traits may be helpful in securing a successful career, and that-in the business context-it may pay off to confidently strive for one's own personal goals with little or no regard for others.…”

Effects of CEOs’ Negative Traits on Corporate Social Responsibility

“…Recent researches have now focused on so-called "successful" psychopaths and narcissists in some context [6], and the dark triad embodies a few of desirable traits like charm, assertiveness, and impression management skills [12]. However, numerous studies have articulated that narcissism has been linked to unethical behavior in CEOs and a need for power [13][14][15], psychopaths can adversely affect productivity [13], and Machiavellianism is associated with diminished organizational commitment [16,17], with a tendency to focus on power and manipulative behaviors [13,18].…”

Studentų Akademinio Cinizmo Raiškos Studijose Sąsajos Su Akademiniu Perdegimu Ir Įsipareigojimu Profesijai

“…occupational commitment (Blau, 2006;Cohen 2007)), kaip įsiparei-gojimas karjerai (angl. career commitment (Zettler et al, 2011)), kaip karjeros įtvir-tinimas (angl. career entrenchment (Carson et al, 1996)).…”