2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.11.760
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dissimilarities of Physical Meaning between Loss of Load indices based on Load Curve Types

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(7). (8)(9)(10)(11)(12). The results illustrate the effect of the Forced Outage Rate (FOR) on the LOLP calculation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(7). (8)(9)(10)(11)(12). The results illustrate the effect of the Forced Outage Rate (FOR) on the LOLP calculation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Choi et al [9] propose a conversion function and a method to transform LOLED (days/year) using daily peak load curve into LOLEH (hours/year) using hourly load curve. The conversion function is formulated as variables of capacity and a forced outage rate of generator.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The three generating-units represented by Fig. (1). The system variation of the average peak load over a period of 10 days summarized in Table I.…”
Section: Methodology and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies carried closer to the present study. Some of these studies performed by Choi et al [1], where in their study they proposed a conversion function and method to transform the Loss of Load Expectation in days per year into hours per year using hourly load curve. The conversion function expressed as variables of capacity and Forced Outage Rate of generating-unit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%