2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00348-018-2663-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dissipation rate estimation in the turbulent boundary layer using high-speed planar particle image velocimetry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These duration and field-of-view configurations covered the expected range of space-time extension of the NWRFs, see figure 4. We used the same processing technique and filtering procedure as has been used previously (Zaripov, Li & Dushin 2019), with slightly different parameters. In order to achieve a steady-state solution, five iterations were executed using DIC algorithm for the first iteration and WIDIM for other iterations using zero-normalised cross-correlation function when estimating the velocity vectors.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These duration and field-of-view configurations covered the expected range of space-time extension of the NWRFs, see figure 4. We used the same processing technique and filtering procedure as has been used previously (Zaripov, Li & Dushin 2019), with slightly different parameters. In order to achieve a steady-state solution, five iterations were executed using DIC algorithm for the first iteration and WIDIM for other iterations using zero-normalised cross-correlation function when estimating the velocity vectors.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, if the appropriate filtering procedure is not applied, eliminating the measurement error and preserving the real NWRF region, one can get a wrong impression about actual values of the spatiotemporal extension of NWRFs. An appropriate filtering procedure was applied in the present work with the detailed description presented elsewhere (Zaripov et al 2019). This allows us to exclude the frequency region where the measurement noise dominates.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The consistency of the profiles of U(y) and u RMS (y) obtained by all the measurements in the log-layer and above cross-validates the reliability of the measurement system. Also included in figure 3 are the results of three DNS datasets relating to a smooth-wall TBL at a similar Reynolds number (Re τ ∼ 1000), obtained by Schlatter et al [31,32], and Sillero et al [33,34], which have been used as standard databases for various studies of flat-plate TBLs [35][36][37][38][39]. Such a comparison clearly shows that the inner peak of the u RMS profile is effectively resolved by the near-wall PTV measurement, where the uncertainty of the peak u RMS is less than 3%.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The last proposal (7.4) is fairly good down to , and then gives a slight overestimation. (In a recent paper, Zaripov, Li & Dushin (2019) apply (7.2) to high-speed planar PIV. The results shown in their figure 13 confirm the present results of figure 17 and the benefit brought by these axisymmetric formula for the estimation of the dissipation in PIV experiments.)…”
Section: Local Axisymmetrymentioning
confidence: 99%