“…Noun-related activation in the frontal areas was generally obtained with tool nouns (e.g., Martin et al, 1996;Tyler et al, 2003), but this category-specificity was not confirmed in other similar studies; for example, Tyler et al (2003) and Sahin et al (2006) found frontal activation associated with nouns that did not refer to manipulable objects. Furthermore, the FTDH obviously predicts the emergence of frontal activation associated with verbs and temporal activation associated with nouns in direct comparison analyses; however, of the 15 imaging studies reporting verb-noun direct contrasts, only 5 found verb-related activation in frontal areas (Perani et al, 1999;Shapiro et al, 2005;Shapiro et al, 2006;Tyler et al, 2003;Tyler et al, 2004) and only 2 showed noun-related activation in temporal areas (Shapiro et al, 2005;Shapiro et al, 2006). A word of caution should be spent here on the fact that, in this line of reasoning, positive and negative evidence for the FTDH are given the same weight, whereas the common process of statistical inference adopted in neuroimaging studies (and in the whole field of psychology, in fact) is somewhat biased towards positive findings, while negative results may remain not fully assessed.…”