2020
DOI: 10.1093/brain/awaa027
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dissociation between frontal and temporal-parietal contributions to connected speech in acute stroke

Abstract: Humans are uniquely able to retrieve and combine words into syntactic structure to produce connected speech. Previous identification of focal brain regions necessary for production focused primarily on associations with the content produced by speakers with chronic stroke, where function may have shifted to other regions after reorganization occurred. Here, we relate patterns of brain damage with deficits to the content and structure of spontaneous connected speech in 52 speakers during the acute stage of a le… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
52
1
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
0
52
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Across the 27 subtests that comprise the CAT, we selected the spoken picture description task as our behavioural index of speech production abilities, with the goal of ensuring the ecological validity of our findings by assessing connected speech production (rather than single word production) in a setting that resembled those encountered in real-world scenarios more closely. Our decision was also motivated by recent efforts to characterise the complex nature of speech production, their deficits and neural correlates using samples of connected speech ( Stark et al , 2019 ; Alyahya et al , 2020; Ding et al ., 2020 ). The CAT spoken picture description task was administered to each patient and the spoken responses scored following standardized procedures described in the assessment battery manual.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Across the 27 subtests that comprise the CAT, we selected the spoken picture description task as our behavioural index of speech production abilities, with the goal of ensuring the ecological validity of our findings by assessing connected speech production (rather than single word production) in a setting that resembled those encountered in real-world scenarios more closely. Our decision was also motivated by recent efforts to characterise the complex nature of speech production, their deficits and neural correlates using samples of connected speech ( Stark et al , 2019 ; Alyahya et al , 2020; Ding et al ., 2020 ). The CAT spoken picture description task was administered to each patient and the spoken responses scored following standardized procedures described in the assessment battery manual.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 94 acute LH stroke patients (51 males; 81 right handed; 88 ischemic stroke; 6 hemorrhagic stroke; age: M = 61 years; standard deviation [SD] = 12 years; range = 25–85 years; education: M = 14 years; SD = 4 years; range = 0–33 years) were recruited from the Memorial Hermann, Houston Methodist, and St. Luke’s hospitals in Houston, TX, USA, as part of an ongoing project ( Martin and Schnur 2019 ; Ding et al. 2020 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Semantic integration (e.g., integrating noun-noun, “apple core”, and verb-noun, “throw dart”, combinations) would seem to necessarily draw on semantic WM to maintain the two concepts such that an appropriate integration could be carried out. With respect to the pSTS, damage to a similar pSTS locus after acute stroke in a subset of patients studied here was associated with reduced ability to produce nouns and increasingly complex word combinations during a narrative production task (Ding et al 2020). In a behavioral analysis of another subset of these patients, semantic WM was necessary for producing increasingly complex word combinations (Martin and Schnur 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…While the current findings cannot distinguish the role of these two regions, other findings in the literature suggest that the LIFG region is involved in retrieving or refreshing semantic representations (Heim et al 2009: Johnson et al 2005; Martin and Chao 2001), whereas the AG is involved more directly in maintaining semantic representations to support meaning integration (Humphries et al 2006). The results showing the involvement of the pSTS are more novel but may underlie the maintenance of several word meanings during complex phrase construction (Ding et al 2020). Further investigation is needed to determine if the engagement of this region replicates and what its distinctive role might be.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation