“…22, since (i) we account for short-range (other than dipole) interactions in the lower partial waves, which would be important for scattering at higher angles; (ii) our Born corrections employ an overestimated dipole moment magnitude (consistent with the HF description of the target molecule); (iii) our model amounts to an approximate rotationally summed cross section from the rotational ground state of the target, without accounting for thermal averages over the initial rotational states (see Oliveira et al 47 for details); and (iv) we do not correct the cross sections to account for undetected electrons at low scattering angles as described by Lunt et al, 22 although we integrate the Regarding the resonances, the lowest-lying structure in the SMCPP ICS, about 0.7 eV, is related to the nearly degenerate π * (B 1 ) and π * (A 2 ) resonances (see below). The peak position agrees with the experimental TCS 22,23 (0.75 and 0.8 eV, respectively), as well as with the ETS data 14,15 (0.73 eV-0.75 eV) and the DEA data 14,[16][17][18] (∼0.7 eV). There is also agreement for the second structure, arising from the σ * CCl anion state, since the peak at 2.8 eV in the SMCPP ICS is consistent with the experimental data (∼2.5 eV).…”