2016
DOI: 10.1037/tra0000148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dissociative features in posttraumatic stress disorder: A latent profile analysis.

Abstract: The study points to the importance of alternative symptoms of dissociation in the dissociative PTSD subtype beyond the symptoms of depersonalization and derealization. (PsycINFO Database Record

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
32
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, distinct sub-groups of DD patients with and without PTSD are also reflected in the specification of a dissociative subtype of PTSD in DSM-5 [56]. The results have important clinical implications: Adopting a context of linking dissociative and trauma-related disorders asks to consider a broad range of dissociative symptoms, not only psychoform derealization or depersonalization phenomena but also somatoform dissociative symptoms [14, 20, 21, 57]. Present results further direct attention to individual maltreatment and coping/learning history to be considered in diagnostics and treatment: While the number of traumatic events may determine the severity of distress, the individual coping history with adversities and traumata may modulate, how symptoms develop and accentuate in patients diagnosed with DD, and potentially overlap with those of individuals diagnosed with PTSD.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, distinct sub-groups of DD patients with and without PTSD are also reflected in the specification of a dissociative subtype of PTSD in DSM-5 [56]. The results have important clinical implications: Adopting a context of linking dissociative and trauma-related disorders asks to consider a broad range of dissociative symptoms, not only psychoform derealization or depersonalization phenomena but also somatoform dissociative symptoms [14, 20, 21, 57]. Present results further direct attention to individual maltreatment and coping/learning history to be considered in diagnostics and treatment: While the number of traumatic events may determine the severity of distress, the individual coping history with adversities and traumata may modulate, how symptoms develop and accentuate in patients diagnosed with DD, and potentially overlap with those of individuals diagnosed with PTSD.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two studies conducted by Wolf et al 2015and Műllerová, Hansen, Contractor, Elhai, and Armour (2016) used a different analytical approach when conducting the LPA. Prior to the analysis, Wolf et al 2015created mean scores for three domains of dissociation (depersonalization/derealization, loss of awareness, and psychogenic amnesia) and used these as indicators in the LPA.…”
Section: 2measurement Of Dissociationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The endorsements of psychogenic amnesia were not significantly different between the two groups. Műllerová et al (2016) also created mean scores for their four domains of dissociation (depersonalization/derealization, gaps in awareness and memory, sensory misperceptions, and cognitive and behavioural re-experiencing) prior to conducting the LPA.…”
Section: 2measurement Of Dissociationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hansen et al, 2017) and not just the studies assessing dissociation more broadly (cf. Müllerová, Hansen, Contractor, Elhai, & Armour, 2016;Wolf et al, 2015). Thus, Hansen et al (2017) review concludes that assessing dissociative symptoms more broadly than depersonalization and de-realization do not add to the understanding of D-PTSD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%