2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2021.10.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dissolved iron cycling in the Arabian Sea and sub-tropical gyre region of the Indian Ocean

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In calculating the nutrient concentration‐based N 2 fixation rate, we are unlikely to have fully accounted for this local P excess (i.e., low N* input) in our P and N budgets, leading to an underestimation of N 2 fixation. Upper ocean dissolved iron measurements from across the Indian basin, albeit limited, reveal generally higher concentrations in the northern versus southern basin (0.1–1.3 nM vs. 0.05–0.5 nM) and near the south‐western and south‐eastern margins versus the south‐central basin (reaching 1.4 vs. 0.2 nM) (Chinni & Singh, 2022; Grand, Measures, Hatta, Hiscock, et al., 2015; Grand, Measures, Hatta, Morton, et al., 2015; Nishioka et al., 2013; Shiozaki et al., 2014; Siefert et al., 1999). Dissolved iron concentrations measured during the WOCE IO5 and IO6 expeditions that sampled the Agulhas region were high, >1 nM at the shelf and >0.3 nM in the current, and attributed to the entrainment of sedimentary iron by the Agulhas Current, augmented by local iron deposition (Grand, Measures, Hatta, Morton, et al., 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In calculating the nutrient concentration‐based N 2 fixation rate, we are unlikely to have fully accounted for this local P excess (i.e., low N* input) in our P and N budgets, leading to an underestimation of N 2 fixation. Upper ocean dissolved iron measurements from across the Indian basin, albeit limited, reveal generally higher concentrations in the northern versus southern basin (0.1–1.3 nM vs. 0.05–0.5 nM) and near the south‐western and south‐eastern margins versus the south‐central basin (reaching 1.4 vs. 0.2 nM) (Chinni & Singh, 2022; Grand, Measures, Hatta, Hiscock, et al., 2015; Grand, Measures, Hatta, Morton, et al., 2015; Nishioka et al., 2013; Shiozaki et al., 2014; Siefert et al., 1999). Dissolved iron concentrations measured during the WOCE IO5 and IO6 expeditions that sampled the Agulhas region were high, >1 nM at the shelf and >0.3 nM in the current, and attributed to the entrainment of sedimentary iron by the Agulhas Current, augmented by local iron deposition (Grand, Measures, Hatta, Morton, et al., 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large portion of the modern Arabian Sea acts as a high nutrient low chlorophyll (HNLC) region due to Fe limitation (Naqvi et al., 2010; Wiggert & Murtugudde, 2007). A recent water column study of dissolved Fe in the Arabian Sea suggests that the surface ocean Fe budget is dominantly controlled by the inputs from lateral and vertical advection with a secondary role of dust deposition (Chinni & Singh, 2022). Lateral advection and upwelling of Fe‐deficient AAIW and deeper waters in the Arabian Sea could be responsible for the Fe limitation (Chinni & Singh, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent water column study of dissolved Fe in the Arabian Sea suggests that the surface ocean Fe budget is dominantly controlled by the inputs from lateral and vertical advection with a secondary role of dust deposition (Chinni & Singh, 2022). Lateral advection and upwelling of Fe‐deficient AAIW and deeper waters in the Arabian Sea could be responsible for the Fe limitation (Chinni & Singh, 2022). Despite higher dust supply during the cold HS and YD (Deplazes et al., 2014; McGee et al., 2013; Figure S8 in Supporting Information ), we observe strong CO 2 degassing suggesting upwelling of Fe‐deficient AAIW responsible for Fe limitation and reduced productivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Indian Ocean, biogeochemical feedbacks dominate, especially in the BoB (R >1, figure 1(b)) where they appear to explain the counter-intuitive reduction of O 2 concentration in the OXYBIO simulation with respect to CTRL (figure 2(b)) as treated in section 3.3. It is noteworthy that the different biogeochemical responses between the AS and BoB is likely due to different levels of oxygen deficiency [34].…”
Section: Mechanisms Involved In the Evolution Of Omzsmentioning
confidence: 99%