2018
DOI: 10.1080/13527258.2018.1534259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dissonant memories of Japanese American incarceration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The inspiration for the association between Japanese American incarceration and contemporary forms of mass detention came not only from historical parallels but also the placement of new forms of detention near or around sites of historic detention. The placement of camps in such areas is not coincidental but relies on strategies of distance and economy (Camp, 2016; Lau‐Ozawa, 2019). The palimpsest of the landscape activated the protests at Dilley and Fort Sill, while the medium of paper cranes articulated the intersections of memory and activism.…”
Section: Origami Activismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inspiration for the association between Japanese American incarceration and contemporary forms of mass detention came not only from historical parallels but also the placement of new forms of detention near or around sites of historic detention. The placement of camps in such areas is not coincidental but relies on strategies of distance and economy (Camp, 2016; Lau‐Ozawa, 2019). The palimpsest of the landscape activated the protests at Dilley and Fort Sill, while the medium of paper cranes articulated the intersections of memory and activism.…”
Section: Origami Activismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He concluded that gardens served as symbols of Japanese American resilience, tools for maintenance of individual and community identities, strategies for coping with conditions of incarceration, and a form of reterritorialization of camp spaces in an environment dedicated to Americanization. Lau-Ozawa (2019a) also explored ways incarceration heritage is memorialized materially at seven understudied detention facilities associated with Gila River. In doing so, he echoes Branton's (2004) and Camp's (2016) calls to view these physically separated locations as part of an interconnected eventscape.…”
Section: -20mentioning
confidence: 99%