Dissonant role perception and paradoxical adjustments: an exploratory study on Medical Residents’ collaboration with Senior Doctors and Head Nurses

Abstract

A good collaboration between health professionals is considered to have benefits for patients, healthcare staff, and organizations. Nevertheless, effective interprofessional collaboration is difficult to achieve. This is particularly true for collaboration between Medical Residents (MRs) and the immediate colleagues they interact with, as Senior Doctors (SDs) and Head Nurses (HNs). Role understanding is one of the factors that may explain difficulties in interprofessional collaboration. Based on this hypothesis, this paper focuses on MRs' role, devoting particular attention to differences in role perception between MRs, SDs, and HNs, and to their consequences for interprofessional collaboration. An exploratory qualitative study inspired by Grounded Theory was conducted in April 2009 in a small peripheral and non-university hospital in Switzerland. Data came from two focus groups with MRs (13), one with SDs (8), and one with HNs (7), and were analyzed using the constant comparative method. Findings show that the expected and the enacted role of MR are perceived differently by SDs, HNs and MRs themselves. To face the inconsistencies within MR's role, the three professional groups develop some adjustments that eventually prove to be paradoxical: on one side, they make collaboration possible and preserve the functioning of the ward, while on the other side they lead to mutual misunderstanding and discontent. These findings suggest that there is an urgent need of defining the role of MRs, of delimiting its boundaries and thereby distinguishing it from other health workers, and eventually of promoting a shared representation of it.

Social and professional influences on antimicrobial prescribing for doctors-in-training: a realist review

“… 27 , 28 , 50 , 53–55 , 64 , 77 , 84 , 97 , 109–113 Such hierarchical environments where the rationale for prescribing decisions is rarely discussed are often perceived to contribute to a culture of using doctors-in-training to provide service rather than prioritizing their learning needs ( CMOC 16 in Part S5). 15 , 63 , 110 , 111 , 113–115 …”

“I didn’t realise they had such a key role.” Impact of medical education curriculum change on medical student interactions with nurses: a qualitative exploratory study of student perceptions

“…The importance of role understanding as a key facet of interprofessional teamwork is also highlighted in a diverse range of policy and practice drivers (WHO 2010; GMC 2016). A better understanding by medical students of the expertise of nurses in relation to medical practice is important as uncertainty about professional roles which blurs professional boundaries can allow misconception and stereotypes to develop about colleagues from other professions (Fiordelli et al 2014). Challenging professional stereotypes and improving interprofessional working requires a shared understanding of the roles of different professions, as well as a consensus on the delegation of and responsibility for different elements of work (Powell and Davies 2012; Salhani and Coulter 2009).…”

Medication communication between nurses and doctors for paediatric acute care: An ethnographic study

“…Fiordelli et al . () found resident doctors felt they were ‘everybody's lackey’ (p. 319) and their most important attributes for success were planning skills and diplomacy with other staff and patients’ families. Residents’ roles in the current study were similarly pressured and time constrained.…”

“…Furthermore, doctors' training prepared them to practise autonomously (Ivory 2015), within an embedded medical hierarchy (Thomson et al 2015). Fiordelli et al (2014) found resident doctors felt they were 'everybody's lackey' (p. 319) and their most important attributes for success were planning skills and diplomacy with other staff and patients' families. Residents' roles in the current study were similarly pressured and time constrained.…”