2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.11.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distal aortic interventions after repair of ascending dissection: The argument for a more aggressive approach

Abstract: Objective: Survivors of ascending aortic dissection repair frequently require downstream aortic interventions. Because of a paucity of data, we assessed early and long-term outcomes, and risk factors, of these distal procedures.Methods: From January 1993 to January 2011, 305 patients underwent 429 distal aortic interventions after acute type A (95% DeBakey type I) dissection repair performed 3.8 years earlier (median); 11% of interventions used an endovascular approach. Maximum aortic size was 5.9 AE 1.3 cm. M… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
83
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
83
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, we examined 129 reoperations (in 89 patients) performed at a single referral aortic center after index repair for acute type A dissection. The results suggest that reoperation after acute Length of stay, d 6 (5-10) 6 (5-9) 9 (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14) Discharge to location other than home…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, we examined 129 reoperations (in 89 patients) performed at a single referral aortic center after index repair for acute type A dissection. The results suggest that reoperation after acute Length of stay, d 6 (5-10) 6 (5-9) 9 (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14) Discharge to location other than home…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elective reoperation (hybrid arch repair, total arch replacement, and distal repair) was associated with 0% in‐hospital mortality. Outcomes of distal aortic interventions were also examined by Roselli et al in 305 patients who underwent reoperation after index type A dissection repair. The authors reported hospital mortality of 6.1% and overall survival of 84% and 73% at 1 and 5 years, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies from high-volume centers on recent experience with total arch replacement have reported a mortality as low as 2%, and it has been consistently <10% even during reoperations. 913 These encourraging results favor consideration for a more aggressive approach at the time of initial intervention that can offer long-term benefits in patients with extensive aortic disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current discussion regarding the management of acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) is focused on whether to perform a proximal repair, such as a hemiarch resection, or an extended repair, such as a total arch replacement, possibly including an elephant trunk or fixed elephant trunk, in hopes of improving long-term outcomes. Suggested indications for performing an extended repair include: young age, 1 connective tissue disorder, 1 enlarged arch, 1 and malperfusion, 2,3 with strategies ranging from extended repair for all ATAAD 4 to more selective approaches. Many recommend a "tear directed" strategy, advocating extended repair for intimal tears on the greater curve of the arch, 1,5 large tears in the proximal descending aorta, 6 or for all arch tears.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%