2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2018.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distal Knee Medial Collateral Ligament Repair With Suture Augmentation

Abstract: The medial collateral ligament (MCL) is the most commonly injured ligament of the knee. Given its extra-articular location, the MCL has great healing capacity such that the mainstay of treatment for most injuries remains conservative management. However, certain injury patterns place patients and athletes at risk of residual valgus laxity, which may require delayed surgical care and prolonged time out from sports. As such, identifying the specific injuries known to place patients at risk for failure with nonop… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although in the limited previous studies describing surgical repair of Stener-like lesions of the MCL no augmentation techniques were used, multiple studies advocate for suture tape or fiber tape augmentation of grade 3 MCL repairs to facilitate additional protection, allow early range of motion, and accelerate rehabilitation. 26,35,36 This has been corroborated with biomechanical analysis demonstrating a superior repair strength of MCL synthetic augmentation versus suture repair alone. 14 In our practice, we limit LARS augmentation for athletes with a significant injury affecting sMCL ligamentous structural integrity, severe fraying, ligament thinning, or excessive laxity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although in the limited previous studies describing surgical repair of Stener-like lesions of the MCL no augmentation techniques were used, multiple studies advocate for suture tape or fiber tape augmentation of grade 3 MCL repairs to facilitate additional protection, allow early range of motion, and accelerate rehabilitation. 26,35,36 This has been corroborated with biomechanical analysis demonstrating a superior repair strength of MCL synthetic augmentation versus suture repair alone. 14 In our practice, we limit LARS augmentation for athletes with a significant injury affecting sMCL ligamentous structural integrity, severe fraying, ligament thinning, or excessive laxity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Several studies advocate for surgical intervention of Stener-like lesions of the distal sMCL to expedite recovery and improve outcomes; nonetheless, these reports primarily describe novel surgical techniques, with limited correlation to clinical outcomes or complications. 25,30,35 To our knowledge, only 15 clinical cases and 2 radiological case series of Stener-like lesions of the sMCL have been previously reported in the literature. 7,9,20 Furthermore, although all clinically reported cases were managed surgically, postoperative outcomes have only been reported in 8 previous patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other authors have had success with placing a hemostat underneath the suture tape before anchor fixation. 22 Although this can be an effective measure, there are concerns that this could introduce slack to the construct and minimize the benefits of suture augmentation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various means of protecting the ligament during healing, such as external bracing, have been advocated to hasten the return to athletic activity or while awaiting treatment for concomitant injuries. More recently, internal bracing with a minimally invasive surgical procedure to help protect the MCL during healing has become [3, 5, 16, 22, 26, 29, 30] available. This involves the placement of heavy suture tape over the superficial MCL, secured on the femur and tibia, to act as an internal brace for the MCL.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%