2011
DOI: 10.1253/circj.cj-10-0133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distal Protection During Primary Coronary Intervention Can Preserve the Index of Microcirculatory Resistance in Patients With Acute Anterior ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Abstract: Background:The objective of this study was to investigate whether a distal protection (DP) device can preserve the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Methods and Results:The study group of 36 consecutive patients with anterior STEMI were randomized into 2 groups of primary PCI with or without DP: stenting without DP (non-DP group, n=17) and with DP (DP group, n=19). The D… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this regard, the use of a mechanical device for thrombus removal or trapping to improve clinical outcomes after p-PCI is attractive, and the efficacy of these devices has been tested in many clinical trials. Although some data, especially those regarding the use of distal protection devices, have failed to show clinical benefits due in part to patient and device selection [48][49][50][51][52][53] , many recent large-scale randomized trials have demonstrated significant improvements in myocardial perfusion 45,[54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67] and the left ventricular function 64,65) in addition to reduced mortality 68) ( 69) . In addition, Burzotta et 70) .…”
Section: Thrombus Aspiration/distal Protection Therapy and Its Efficacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, the use of a mechanical device for thrombus removal or trapping to improve clinical outcomes after p-PCI is attractive, and the efficacy of these devices has been tested in many clinical trials. Although some data, especially those regarding the use of distal protection devices, have failed to show clinical benefits due in part to patient and device selection [48][49][50][51][52][53] , many recent large-scale randomized trials have demonstrated significant improvements in myocardial perfusion 45,[54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67] and the left ventricular function 64,65) in addition to reduced mortality 68) ( 69) . In addition, Burzotta et 70) .…”
Section: Thrombus Aspiration/distal Protection Therapy and Its Efficacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, another report demonstrated that distal protection during PCI effectively retrieved the embolic debris and preserved the index of microcirculatory resistance in patients with an acute anterior STEMI [14]. Embolic protection devices are designed to be able to retrieve atherothrombotic debris and prevent its distal embolisation, but their effect on clinical outcomes has not been established, except for saphenous vein bypass grafts [6,7,[15][16][17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In patients undergoing coronary stenting for stable angina and ST-elevation MI (STEMI), stent placement was found to cause microvascular injury as evaluated by IMR. [20][21][22] Previous data from Melikian, et al suggest that there is large overlap in IMR values between patients with or without epicardial atherosclerosis. Impact of smoking on coronary physiology: The finding that among patients with CAD, smokers had greater IMR than nonsmokers, suggests that smoking adversely affects coronary microcirculatory resistance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%