2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2015.10.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distally based sural flap for ankle and foot coverage in children

Abstract: IV, retrospective case-series study.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chen et al suggested that the proximity limitation of the ap should not be beyond 6 cm from the popliteal crease [2]. Some authors have reported the highest location of the ap being 1-2 cm or 1.5-4 cm away from the popliteal crease [25,33]. However, other authors have reported using aps with the proximal border near the popliteal crease in repairing the defects of the forefoot [14,34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chen et al suggested that the proximity limitation of the ap should not be beyond 6 cm from the popliteal crease [2]. Some authors have reported the highest location of the ap being 1-2 cm or 1.5-4 cm away from the popliteal crease [25,33]. However, other authors have reported using aps with the proximal border near the popliteal crease in repairing the defects of the forefoot [14,34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various modifications of the sural and peroneusbrevis flaps have been described to optimize the outcome and minimize complications [63][64][65][66][67] . The distally based peroneus brevis flap has been described as an efficient tool for the reconstruction of the distal lower leg, ankle, Achilles tendon and proximal foot region [4,65,[68][69][70][71][72][73] . This flap can be indicated to cover exposed vessels, bones, tendons, and internal fixation hardware.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grandjean et al 5 have successfully used distally based sural artery flap in children with an age range of 1.5–17 years, with an average of 8.8 years. In our study, the age groups vary from 6 to 68 years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this flap provides a wide arc of rotation, a rapid coverage, and easy and quick elevation, the main disadvantages are the congestion due to poor venous drainage (if no small saphenous vein microanastomosis supercharging is done), sensory loss over the lateral aspect of the foot, 3 tension to close the donor site, 4 partial or total necrosis 5 due to the 180 degrees of rotation, the tunnelization, and the insufficient blood supply of the median sural arteries for the upper half of the posterior calf (if no gastrocnemius branch perforators are included), especially on medial malleolus (greater arc of rotation of flap and larger defects). 2 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%