2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distance-adjusted motor threshold for transcranial magnetic stimulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
122
1
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 191 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
7
122
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For rIFG and rIFJ, the coil was positioned with the handle in an upward vertical orientation, whereas for preSMA, it was oriented with the handle in a posterior direction. The output intensity was calibrated according to the maximum level of comfortable stimulation, expressed as a proportion of resting motor threshold (average = 51.5% of maximum stimulator output), and corrected for differences in scalp-cortex distance between brain regions (55,56). This protocol yielded an average stimulation output of 70% distance-adjusted motor threshold (range 51-80%) and an average stimulator output of 30% (range 20-39%).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For rIFG and rIFJ, the coil was positioned with the handle in an upward vertical orientation, whereas for preSMA, it was oriented with the handle in a posterior direction. The output intensity was calibrated according to the maximum level of comfortable stimulation, expressed as a proportion of resting motor threshold (average = 51.5% of maximum stimulator output), and corrected for differences in scalp-cortex distance between brain regions (55,56). This protocol yielded an average stimulation output of 70% distance-adjusted motor threshold (range 51-80%) and an average stimulator output of 30% (range 20-39%).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33 Thus, to adjust for coil-to-cortex distance, stimu lation was delivered at 120% of the distance-adjusted RMT (AdjRMT) according to the equation AdjRMT = RMT + 2.8 × (D DLPFC -D M1 ), where AdjRMT is the adjusted RMT in % stimulator output, RMT is the unadjusted RMT in % stimulator output, D M1 is the distance between the scalp and the motor cortex (M1), and D DLPFC is the distance between the scalp and DLPFC. 32 In order to localize the DLPFC stimulation site, a structural MRI (parameters: high-resolution, T 1 -weighted, 128 slices, repetition time [TR] 9.08 ms, echo time [TE] 2.70 ms, matrix size 256 × 256, slice thickness 1.40 mm, 1.5 T Signa General Electric scanner) was coregistered to participants' heads using a magnetic tracking device (miniBIRD, Ascension Technology Group) for coil-to-cortex coregistration. The targeted stimulation site for the DLPFC was an area between the centre of Brodmann area (BA) 9 and the border of BA 9 and 46, based on the conservative definition of these areas in previous research.…”
Section: Rtms Treatment and Neuronavigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…30,31 Unadjusted stimulation J Psychiatry Neurosci 2016;41(4) may lead to both understimulation and overstimulation depending on the coil-to-cortex distance. 32 Greater coil-to-cortex distance has been associated with reduced efficacy of therapeutic TMS. 33 Thus, to adjust for coil-to-cortex distance, stimu lation was delivered at 120% of the distance-adjusted RMT (AdjRMT) according to the equation AdjRMT = RMT + 2.8 × (D DLPFC -D M1 ), where AdjRMT is the adjusted RMT in % stimulator output, RMT is the unadjusted RMT in % stimulator output, D M1 is the distance between the scalp and the motor cortex (M1), and D DLPFC is the distance between the scalp and DLPFC.…”
Section: Rtms Treatment and Neuronavigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to distinguish between these two possibilities, individual structural magnetic resonance imaging scans co-localised to neuronavigated TMS would be required to establish scalp-cortex distance (see Stokes et al, 2007).…”
Section: Sici Is Increased In Elderly Participants With Ap Coil Orienmentioning
confidence: 99%