2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10878-016-0091-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distance domination in graphs with given minimum and maximum degree

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These bounds were improved in the paper by Henning and Lichiardopol , who established the following results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These bounds were improved in the paper by Henning and Lichiardopol , who established the following results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…k Theorem 6 (Henning and Lichiardopol [16]). For ≥ k 2, if G is a connected graph with a minimum degree ≥ δ 2 and maximum degree Δ and of order ≥…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Kundu and Majumder [16] and Barman et al [3] presented an optimal linear-time algorithm for the problem on trees and interval graphs, respectively. The k-dominating number of a graph G, denoted by γ k (G), is the cardinality of a minimum k-hop dominating set of G. The k-dominating number has been widely studied in the literature; see for example [7,10,12,18,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modern study of domination has connections to game theory, coding theory, and matching theory; see [13] and [12] for extensive background. The extension of domination notions to the cases d > 1 in Definitions 1.1 and 1.2 follows [19] and [14], for example. The case d = 1 of Definition 1.3 corresponds to the γ-graph γ • G, introduced by Subramanian and Sridharan [29] and subsequently studied in [28], [1], [27], [3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%