2019
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2019/02/028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distance priors from Planck final release

Abstract: We present the distance priors from the finally released P lanck TT,TE,EE + lowE data in 2018. The uncertainties are around 40% smaller than those from P lanck 2015 TT+lowP. In order to check the validity of these new distance priors, we adopt the distance priors to constrain the cosmological parameters in different dark energy models, including the ΛCDM model, the wCDM model and the CPL model, and conclude that the distance priors provide consistent constraints on the relevant cosmological parameters compared… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
123
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
123
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 See Ref. [76] for a recent release from the Planck Collaboration and also Ref. [77] for a discussion on model dependence in CMB distance priors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 See Ref. [76] for a recent release from the Planck Collaboration and also Ref. [77] for a discussion on model dependence in CMB distance priors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The datasets that we used in this work are included from background datasets and growth rate of perturbations from RSD observations. The background datasets used here are: the CMB distance prior from final Planck 2018 [51]; SnIa data from Pantheon sample [53]; some of the latest measurements from cosmic chronometers for H (z) [52]; measurements of D V (z) from WiggleZ [54], 6df Galaxy [55], MGS [56]; BAO measurements from BOSS DR12 [37]; Radial and transverse BAO measurements from Lyα-Forests SDSS DR12 [39]; Radial and transverse BAO measurements from quasar sample of BOSS DR14 [57]; measurements of the angular diameter distance from DES collaboration [58]; baryon density measurements derived from BBN [59]; local measurements on the Hubble constant H 0 [15]. The growth rate data used in our analysis are the f σ 8 data extracted from RSD data from 2dFGRS [60], WiggleZ [61], 6dFGRS [62], SDSS Main galaxy sample [63], 2MTF [64], BOSS DR12 [65], Fast Sound [66] and finally eBOSS DR14 observations [67].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, for a sample of lensed GW systems with their source redshifts satisfying the distribution shown in Figure 1, we pick each system one by one and then individually determine its lens redshift by considering z s − z l curve presented in Figure 2. In order to investigate the complementarity of strongly lensed GW systems to already existing popular probes on constraining dark energy equation of state, we include the latest Planck 2018 CMB observations (Planck Collaboration 2018; Chen et al 2018) and SNe Ia from the upcoming DES Hybrid 10-field Survey (Table 14 of For CMB data, we use the information about the heights of the peaks of CMB temperature spectrum along the lineof-sight, i.e. the shift parameter R. For SNe Ia, the mock distance modulus-redshift data given in Bernstein et al (2012) is used.…”
Section: Simulation and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%