2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2006.05.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distant metastases in head and neck carcinoma: Identification of prognostic groups with MR imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also report that nodal status was important to patient outcome whereas this relationship was not significant in the pimonidazole study. Our findings of an association between nodal involvement and poor patient outcome supports the reports in the literature that nodal status is the most important predictor of outcome in HNSCC 43,44 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…We also report that nodal status was important to patient outcome whereas this relationship was not significant in the pimonidazole study. Our findings of an association between nodal involvement and poor patient outcome supports the reports in the literature that nodal status is the most important predictor of outcome in HNSCC 43,44 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…30,31 Risk factors include clinically palpable neck lymph nodes, histological evidence of nodal metastasis and extracapsular spread. [30][31][32] The lung is the most common site, representing 66% of haematogeneous metastases. 31 Differential diagnosis between lung metastasis from SCC and synchronous primary SCC is not easy (Figure 7).…”
Section: Scc Stagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ljumanovic et al [24] identified prognostic groups with MR imaging for the development of distant metastases. The low-risk group consisted of patients without MRI-positive nodes, the intermediate-risk group consisted of patients with MRI-positive nodes without signs of extranodal spread and the high-risk group consisted of patients with MRIpositive nodes with signs of extranodal spread.…”
Section: Variablementioning
confidence: 99%