2019
DOI: 10.1177/1536867x19893626
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

distcomp: Comparing distributions

Abstract: In this article, I introduce the distcomp command, which assesses whether two distributions differ at each possible value while controlling the probability of any false positive, even in finite samples. I discuss syntax and the underlying methodology (from Goldman and Kaplan [2018, Journal of Econometrics 206: 143–166]). Multiple examples illustrate the distcomp command, including revisiting the experimental data of Gneezy and List (2006, Econometrica 74: 1365–1384) and the regression discontinuity design of C… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2) 22 We use the STATA discomp package developed in Kaplan (2019). Because of "multiple testing problem" that increases the Type I error (α), the KS-based multiple test uses "familywise error rate" (FWER) that provides the probability of rejecting at least one true null hypothesis.…”
Section: A Within-between Decompositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(2) 22 We use the STATA discomp package developed in Kaplan (2019). Because of "multiple testing problem" that increases the Type I error (α), the KS-based multiple test uses "familywise error rate" (FWER) that provides the probability of rejecting at least one true null hypothesis.…”
Section: A Within-between Decompositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of "multiple testing problem" that increases the Type I error (α), the KS-based multiple test uses "familywise error rate" (FWER) that provides the probability of rejecting at least one true null hypothesis. For the details of this test, please see Goldman and Kaplan (2018) and Kaplan (2019).…”
Section: A Within-between Decompositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data on individuals originate from Sweden's official wage statistics and contain detailed information on a representative sample of the labor force, including full-time equivalent wages, education, occupation, and gender. 23 All data sets are matched by unique identification codes. To make the sample of firms consistent across the time periods, we restrict our analysis to firms with at least 20 employees in the nonagricultural private sector, which are available throughout the period.…”
Section: The Swedish Linked Employer-employee Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 This wage difference declines somewhat during the later period, 2003-2009, where the wage advantage for men is approximately 15 percent. 23 The worker data originate from the Swedish annual salary survey (Lönestrukturstatistiken). The survey's sampling units consist of firms included in Statistics Sweden's firm data base (FS).…”
Section:  mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10There have also been advances in flexible parametric quantile regression methods, due to Frumento and Bottai (2016, 2017) and implemented by Bottai and Orsini (2019). Similarly, there have been advances in the econometric methods for comparing unconditional distributions, due to Goldman and Kaplan (2018) and implemented by Kaplan (2019). Carter et al (2019) offer a great illustration of how one can use information ‘in the tails’ to drive better development policy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%