2017
DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2016.538
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinct Abnormalities of Small Bowel and Regional Colonic Volumes in Subtypes of Irritable Bowel Syndrome Revealed by MRI

Abstract: OBJECTIVES:Non-invasive biomarkers which identify different mechanisms of disease in subgroups of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) could be valuable. Our aim was to seek useful magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) parameters that could distinguish each IBS subtypes.METHODS:34 healthy volunteers (HV), 30 IBS with diarrhea (IBS-D), 16 IBS with constipation (IBS-C), and 11 IBS with mixed bowel habit (IBS-M) underwent whole-gut transit and small and large bowel volumes assessment with MRI scans from t=0 to t=360 min. Si… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…13,14 Additionally, chyme heterogeneity in the ascending colon has been assessed with subjective observer scores, 13 and more objectively with imaging-based feature analysis. 15 Colonic segmental volumes can be quantified from T 2 -weighted MRI sequences, where the colon wall shows high contrast to surrounding fat tissue, [16][17][18][19] a method with high reliability between observers. 20 T 2 -weighted MRI has also been used to quantify the amount of free water pockets in the small bowel and colon after drinking water, due to the images' high signal strength corresponding to free water.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13,14 Additionally, chyme heterogeneity in the ascending colon has been assessed with subjective observer scores, 13 and more objectively with imaging-based feature analysis. 15 Colonic segmental volumes can be quantified from T 2 -weighted MRI sequences, where the colon wall shows high contrast to surrounding fat tissue, [16][17][18][19] a method with high reliability between observers. 20 T 2 -weighted MRI has also been used to quantify the amount of free water pockets in the small bowel and colon after drinking water, due to the images' high signal strength corresponding to free water.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An additional advantage of MRI is that a number of parameters of GI motor function can be derived from a single MRI study of a patient, some of which would otherwise require separate techniques and appointments. In addition to GI transit time, MRI can visualise anatomy, measure colonic volume, colonic wall movement (motility), freely mobile water content, chyme relaxometry, gas content and abnormalities of colonic wall thickness [73,74,80,81]. Recently, the MRI tagging technique helped to visualise the movement of colonic chyme in subjects with and without constipation [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An interesting Single-photon Emission Computed Tomography/ Magnetic Resonance The MRI capsules method was applied in studies of adult constipation, whereby whole gut transit measured by MRI was significantly slower for patients with functional constipation compared with healthy controls (p < 0.01) [73], and for irritable bowel syndrome with constipation compared with healthy controls (p < 0.01 [73] and p < 0.03 [74]). Similarly, in another study healthy volunteers swallowed 5 MRI marker capsules (overall outer dimensions 23.9 mm × 6.0 mm) containing a saline water solution doped with gadolinium contrast agent [75].…”
Section: Magnetic Resonance Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prospective comparative study of MRI versus CT or US would give more information of the diagnostic potential of these imaging modalities in chronic NSAP. Objective assessments of the gastric, small bowel, and colonic regional volumes are possible using MRI, and unique data emphasizing the differences in gut volumes and motility related to chronic pain syndrome may be now possible [32,33]. Finally, we did not test cost-effectiveness of MRI in NSAP because we were more interested in additional diagnostic potential of MRI in chronic pain syndrome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%