2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaac.2023.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinct Associations of Deprivation and Threat With Alterations in Brain Structure in Early Childhood

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Threat has been posited to influence affective brain systems, while deprivation has been posited to influence cognitive brain systems. These predictions have been supported by a systematic review (McLaughlin et al, 2019) (though see Machlin et al, 2023). However, detractors of this theory also argue that adversity dimensions often overlap and are not as distinct as they seem (Smith & Pollak, 2021).…”
Section: Applications To Developmental Neurosciencementioning
confidence: 93%
“…Threat has been posited to influence affective brain systems, while deprivation has been posited to influence cognitive brain systems. These predictions have been supported by a systematic review (McLaughlin et al, 2019) (though see Machlin et al, 2023). However, detractors of this theory also argue that adversity dimensions often overlap and are not as distinct as they seem (Smith & Pollak, 2021).…”
Section: Applications To Developmental Neurosciencementioning
confidence: 93%
“…Instead, environmental experiences associated with high and low socioeconomic status are likely to be, in part, responsible for individual differences in brain development. Among these experiences, chronic stressors such as environmental deprivation, exposure to threat, and lower levels of caregiver social support are one set of factors associated with altered brain volumes ( Brody et al, 2017 , Kok et al, 2015 , Machlin et al, 2023 , Mackes et al, 2020 , McLaughlin et al, 2019 ). These experiences have also been linked with psychopathology risk, with several theoretical perspectives and empirical findings implicating chronic stress as an environmental risk factor for depression ( Belleau et al, 2019 , Monroe and Harkness, 2005 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stimulation discrepancy deprivation model theorizes that various structural environmental exposures (ie, deprivation, discrepancy, and stimulation or threat) may be associated with the risk for psychosis through distinct neurobiological mechanisms . For example, deprivation (defined as emotional neglect and poverty) was inversely associated with HV, whereas threat (defined as physical, emotional, and sexual abuse) did not have an association . Racial and ethnic inequality and social fragmentation are classified as discrepancy exposures, which describe environments that foster a sense of social exclusion, isolation, or lack of belonging .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 11 For example, deprivation (defined as emotional neglect and poverty) was inversely associated with HV, whereas threat (defined as physical, emotional, and sexual abuse) did not have an association. 12 Racial and ethnic inequality and social fragmentation are classified as discrepancy exposures, which describe environments that foster a sense of social exclusion, isolation, or lack of belonging. 13 Childhood area–level social fragmentation, defined as the proportion of individuals who moved (ie, residential instability) and single-parent households, has been shown to partially explain the association between urban upbringing and nonaffective psychotic disorders even after adjusting for socioeconomic indices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%