2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.05.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinct bioenergetic signatures in particulate versus mineral-associated soil organic matter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
49
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
3
49
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Low molecular weight compounds can become MAOM in two ways: they can leach from plant litter or be produced by exoenzyme depolymerization of plant litter and associate directly with the mineral phase (the “ex vivo modification pathway” sensu Liang, Schimel, & Jastrow, , and see Sanderman, Maddern, & Baldock, ), or they can be produced by the “in vivo microbial turnover pathway” sensu Liang et al () whereby microbiota decompose and transform organic material, resulting in necromass or exudates which are then incorporated into MAOM. Compared to POM, MAOM has a lower C/N ratio, fewer plant‐derived compounds, more microbial‐derived compounds, and a higher natural abundance δ 13 C (Baldock & Skjemstad, ; Christensen, ; Poirier et al, ; von Lützow et al, ; Williams, Fogel, Berhe, & Plante, ; Table ).…”
Section: Pom and Maom: Two Fundamentally Different Som Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Low molecular weight compounds can become MAOM in two ways: they can leach from plant litter or be produced by exoenzyme depolymerization of plant litter and associate directly with the mineral phase (the “ex vivo modification pathway” sensu Liang, Schimel, & Jastrow, , and see Sanderman, Maddern, & Baldock, ), or they can be produced by the “in vivo microbial turnover pathway” sensu Liang et al () whereby microbiota decompose and transform organic material, resulting in necromass or exudates which are then incorporated into MAOM. Compared to POM, MAOM has a lower C/N ratio, fewer plant‐derived compounds, more microbial‐derived compounds, and a higher natural abundance δ 13 C (Baldock & Skjemstad, ; Christensen, ; Poirier et al, ; von Lützow et al, ; Williams, Fogel, Berhe, & Plante, ; Table ).…”
Section: Pom and Maom: Two Fundamentally Different Som Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• More simple compounds with low activation energies • More assimilable compounds for microbes and plants Jilling et al (2018), Kleber et al (2015), Williams et al (2018) MAOM consists of single molecules or microscopic fragments of organic material that have either leached directly from plant material or been chemically transformed by the soil biota ( Figure 1). The defining difference between them is that MAOM is protected from decomposition through association with soil minerals, while POM is not.…”
Section: Dominant Chemical Constituentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particle size, distribution, and mineral-metal composition can provide complementary information regarding transport velocities, weathering, and hydrologic conditions (e.g., exposure to fluctuating redox conditions). In addition to fingerprint methods, direct measurements OM age, through radiocarbon measurements (Marwick et al, 2015) or metabolic availability indicated by O/C content versus H/C content (Kim et al, 2003;Williams et al, 2018) can be achieved. When the OM chemical composition and matrix properties are used in combination then a composite picture is assembled similar to the turnover frequency histograms depicted in Figures 1, 2.…”
Section: Substrate Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Energy density (ED, in J mg −1 OM) was thus determined by dividing energy content by TG mass loss (Plante et al 2011;Rovira et al 2008). Activation energy (E a , in kJ mol −1 CO 2 ) was determined following the methods of Williams et al (2014), assuming first-order reaction kinetics during ramped combustion, and described in further detail in Williams et al (2018). The return-onenergy-investment (ROI) ratio (Harvey et al 2016) which has been demonstrated to be directly related to the biodegradability of pyrogenic organic matter was calculated for each biochar sample by dividing ED by E a .…”
Section: Elemental and Thermal Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%