2020
DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2020.604995
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinct Changes in Global Brain Synchronization in Early-Onset vs. Late-Onset Parkinson Disease

Abstract: Early- and late-onset Parkinson’s disease (EOPD and LOPD, respectively) have different risk factors, clinical features, and disease course; however, the functional outcome of these differences have not been well characterized. This study investigated differences in global brain synchronization changes and their clinical significance in EOPD and LOPD patients. Patients with idiopathic PD including 25 EOPD and 24 LOPD patients, and age- and sex-matched healthy control (HC) subjects including 27 younger and 26 ol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparison with the HC group, subjects in the PD-moderate group exhibited reduced ReHo values in the cerebral cortex while subjects in the PD-mild group did not, including the Rolandic_Oper_R, Temporal_Sup_R, Postcentral_R, and Precentral_R regions. Some previous studies have reported structural or functional alterations in the Rolandic Operculum in PD patients (New et al, 2015 ; Xu et al, 2018 ; Liu et al, 2019 ; Wang T. et al, 2020 ). One previous study focused on the voice network of PD patients with vocalization impairment; this work identified alterations in the Rolandic Operculum (New et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In comparison with the HC group, subjects in the PD-moderate group exhibited reduced ReHo values in the cerebral cortex while subjects in the PD-mild group did not, including the Rolandic_Oper_R, Temporal_Sup_R, Postcentral_R, and Precentral_R regions. Some previous studies have reported structural or functional alterations in the Rolandic Operculum in PD patients (New et al, 2015 ; Xu et al, 2018 ; Liu et al, 2019 ; Wang T. et al, 2020 ). One previous study focused on the voice network of PD patients with vocalization impairment; this work identified alterations in the Rolandic Operculum (New et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…As one of the robust fMRI metrics, degree centrality (DC) has been applied to map the integrated nodes in functional networks at the voxel level by calculating the functional connectivity of each voxel with the others and has revealed impaired DC in several cortices relevant to motor or cognitive dysfunction in PD. These findings have yielded evidence to support that disrupted global synchronization is an element in the neuropathology of PD (11)(12)(13). Nevertheless, the majority of these previous findings were adopted as the static pattern, which ignored the dynamic property of neuronal activities since intrinsic fluctuations are time-varying rather than constant during acquisition (14).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Referring to a previous setting (19)(20)(21), the parameters of the sliding time window were chosen with 50 TR (100 s) for the window length and five TR (10 s) for the step size, generating 39 consecutive windows within the entire time series. The DC map within each window was calculated separately as follows: (i) computation of the Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) between any pair of voxels within the prior probability whole-brain GM mask; (ii) generation of a whole-brain correlation matrix for an individual by thresholding the r at 0.25 as previously described (12,22); and (iii) creation of a graph of the DC values by calculating the weighted DC value of whole-brain network. The standard deviation (SD) of all DC maps across 39 moving windows was calculated and further standardized by subtracting the global mean value of the GM and then dividing that value by the SD, which was defined as the temporal variability of DC.…”
Section: Dynamic DC Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A matrix of Pearson correlation coefficients between a given voxel and all other voxels was generated to show the whole-brain functional connectivity matrix for each voxel. An undirected adjacency matrix was then generated by setting a threshold to each correlation at an r value more than 0.25 ( Buckner et al, 2009 ; Wang et al, 2018 ; Wang et al, 2020 ). DC is defined as the sum of weights (r-values) of significant functional connections ( r > 0.25) for each voxel.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%