2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinct differences in the pattern of hemodynamic response to happy and angry facial expressions in infants — A near-infrared spectroscopic study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

16
88
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
16
88
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as mentioned above, the most important region in processing facial expressions is the occipital temporal area, including the superior temporal sulcus (STS) (Andrews & Ewbank, 2004;Said et al, 2010). Our group previously applied NIRS to measure the brain activity in the bilateral occipital temporal area overlying the STS of 6-to 7-month-old infants while they viewed facial expressions and found face-related cerebral hemodynamic response (Nakato, Otsuka, Kanazawa, Yamaguchi, & Kakigi, 2011). For typically developed adults, it has been reported that the processing of facial expression occurs dominantly in the right hemisphere (Etcoff, 1984;Gainotti, 2012;Nakamura et al 1999;Tsuchiya, Kawasaki, Oya, Howard, & Adolphs, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as mentioned above, the most important region in processing facial expressions is the occipital temporal area, including the superior temporal sulcus (STS) (Andrews & Ewbank, 2004;Said et al, 2010). Our group previously applied NIRS to measure the brain activity in the bilateral occipital temporal area overlying the STS of 6-to 7-month-old infants while they viewed facial expressions and found face-related cerebral hemodynamic response (Nakato, Otsuka, Kanazawa, Yamaguchi, & Kakigi, 2011). For typically developed adults, it has been reported that the processing of facial expression occurs dominantly in the right hemisphere (Etcoff, 1984;Gainotti, 2012;Nakamura et al 1999;Tsuchiya, Kawasaki, Oya, Howard, & Adolphs, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Haemodynamic changes during the face recognition process as assessed by NIRS have been documented in several studies (Blasi et al, 2007;Csibra et al, 2004;Grossmann et al, 2008;Honda et al, 2010;Ichikawa et al, 2010;Nakato et al, 2009Nakato et al, , 2011aNakato et al, , 2011bOtsuka et al, 2007). Newborns showed a spontaneous preference for face-like stimuli over non-face-like patterns (Fantz, 1961).…”
Section: Haemodynamic Responses In Infants During Face Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Numerous behavioural and electrophysiological studies have demonstrated that 5-7-month-old infants can visibly discriminate different facial expressions and exhibit an attention bias towards salient facial expressions (Leppanen & Nelson, 2009). Recent NIRS studies have demonstrated that infants show different haemodynamic responses to different facial stimuli (Nakato et al, 2009(Nakato et al, , 2011a(Nakato et al, , 2011b.…”
Section: Haemodynamic Responses In Infants During Face Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Instruments of this type allow observation of dynamic changes in regional cerebral blood flows (rCBFs) in real time by monitoring the concentration changes in cerebral Hb. The recent advent of multi-channel CW-type instruments has greatly increased the use of NIRS in a variety of neuroimaging studies [14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%