2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrp.2012.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinct emotional abilities converge: Evidence from emotional understanding and emotion recognition through the voice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ERA is considered the core component of ability EI that precedes more complex abilities including emotional understanding and the management of one’s own and others’ emotions. MacCann, Pearce, and Roberts (2011), Thingujam, Laukka, and Elfenbein (2012), and Libbrecht and Lievens (2012) found positive correlations of ERA measures with emotional understanding and emotion management, which we expect to replicate here.…”
Section: Gender and Agesupporting
confidence: 66%
“…ERA is considered the core component of ability EI that precedes more complex abilities including emotional understanding and the management of one’s own and others’ emotions. MacCann, Pearce, and Roberts (2011), Thingujam, Laukka, and Elfenbein (2012), and Libbrecht and Lievens (2012) found positive correlations of ERA measures with emotional understanding and emotion management, which we expect to replicate here.…”
Section: Gender and Agesupporting
confidence: 66%
“…On an empirical level, the convergence between these two narrow abilities of EI has been clearly positive. The Situational Test of Emotion Understanding (STEU) correlates with perception of emotion in tone of voice, with estimates of r = .53 and .31 (MacCann, Pearce, & Roberts, 2011;Thingujam, Laukka, & Elfenbein, 2012).…”
Section: Emotion Perception and Emotion Understandingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We may also utilize our knowledge of others’ emotional expressiveness and experiences to perceptually identify spontaneous emotional displays, thus resulting in a complex amalgamation of emotion knowledge and emotion recognition skills (e.g., Fabes, Eisenberg, Nyman, & Michealieu, 1991). Although these skills are likely intertwined, correlational analyses (Mayer et al, 1999; Mayer, Salovey, Caruso, & Sitarenios, 2003; Perez Rivera & Dunsmore, 2011; Thingujam, Laukka, & Elfenbein, 2012) and tests of factor structure (Barbosa-Leiker, Strand, Mamey, & Downs, 2014; Bassett, Denham, Mincic, & Graling, 2012) support emotion recognition and emotion knowledge as two distinct but moderately related components of emotion understanding.…”
Section: A Model Of Emotion Understandingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This scarcity of measures including both abilities likely contributes to the lack of comprehensive assessment of emotion understanding in empirical studies. It is important to note that some studies do include measures of emotion understanding spanning both abilities (e.g., Mayer et al, 2003; Perez Rivera & Dunsmore, 2011; Thingujam et al, 2012); these studies are arguably more inclusive in their assessment of emotion understanding. However, our review of the literature suggests that most studies rely on measures assessing only one broad ability to represent the construct of emotion understanding.…”
Section: Measuring Emotion Understandingmentioning
confidence: 99%