2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinct functional roles of the mirror neuron system and the mentalizing system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, our study implied that the MNS basic function is not only a motor controller since participants remained still and simply observed the action will not requiring any extra motor control function in this process (OBS tasks), the result indicated improvements in Oxy-Hb and Deoxy-Hb in action observation task after exercise to support moderate exercise was indeed stimulating the action understanding function. Similar to the argument mentioned above, some researchers also argued that parts of MNS (dorsal part of PMC) was responded by the action understanding, but the theory of mind or social cognition function is control by MENT (dorsal part of mPFC and the IFG as another part of MNS) (Geiger et al, 2019), even this statement is true, the result from our study indicated that exercise might benefit social cognition is still valid. Since in IFG region, the activation of low-level participants was still improved.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, our study implied that the MNS basic function is not only a motor controller since participants remained still and simply observed the action will not requiring any extra motor control function in this process (OBS tasks), the result indicated improvements in Oxy-Hb and Deoxy-Hb in action observation task after exercise to support moderate exercise was indeed stimulating the action understanding function. Similar to the argument mentioned above, some researchers also argued that parts of MNS (dorsal part of PMC) was responded by the action understanding, but the theory of mind or social cognition function is control by MENT (dorsal part of mPFC and the IFG as another part of MNS) (Geiger et al, 2019), even this statement is true, the result from our study indicated that exercise might benefit social cognition is still valid. Since in IFG region, the activation of low-level participants was still improved.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…However, several studies were skeptical about the role that the MNS played in social cognition, arguing that the MNS was simply the motor controller and did not include action understanding which is one of the most important basic functions in social cognition (Baird et al, 2011;Hickok et al, 2011b). Besides, other studies declared that the dorsal part of the premotor cortex in MNS did play a role in action understanding, but only the dorsomedial prefrontal of MNS which was called the mentalizing system (MENT) activated by the social relevant tasks (Spunt and Lieberman, 2012;Geiger et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In typically developing (TD) individuals, inferences about the mental states of conspecifics are made automatically, most of the time unconsciously, in everyday social interactions. On a neural level, MENT is systematically activated when deducing inner states from human motion (Blake & Shiffrar, 2007; de Lange et al, 2008;Geiger et al, 2019;Spunt et al, 2010Spunt et al, , 2011Spunt & Lieberman, 2012a, 2012bTroje, 2013). Vogeley (2017) proposed the interplay between MNS and MENT to be divided into detection and evaluation, where the MNS serves the detection of bodily signals and the MENT serves the evaluation of inner states of the observed individual(s) (Vogeley, 2017).…”
Section: Attributing Inner Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This particular selection was intended for a functional neuroimaging study where task difficulty across conditions was ideally balanced between both tasks (Geiger et al, 2019). We therefore conducted an online survey using the remaining 83 clips to receive an additional annotation for these animations.…”
Section: Homogenizing For Recognition Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applying this data to further homogenize the stimulus set we ended with a fully balanced subset of 32 animation clips (eight variations of each of four possible combinations: two actions × two moods). This specific subset was prepared for a particular fMRI study that focused on the differential activation of the action observation network and the mentalizing system (also called theory of mind system) as related to action and emotion recognition (Geiger et al, 2019). The current article introduces the ACASS database (Annotated Character Animation Stimulus Set) and reports the details of stimulus generation, the algorithm used for feature extraction, as well as the exemplary stepwise stimulus selection procedure leading to the subset(s).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%