Distinct neural responses to conscious versus unconscious monetary reward cues

Abstract

Human reward pursuit is often assumed to involve conscious processing of reward information. However, recent research revealed that reward cues enhance cognitive performance even when perceived without awareness. Building on this discovery, the present functional MRI study tested two hypotheses using a rewarded mental-rotation task. First, we examined whether subliminal rewards engage the ventral striatum (VS), an area implicated in reward anticipation. Second, we examined differences in neural responses to supraliminal versus subliminal rewards. Results indicated that supraliminal, but not subliminal, high-value reward cues engaged brain areas involved in reward processing (VS) and task performance (supplementary motor area, motor cortex, and superior temporal gyrus). This pattern of findings is striking given that subliminal rewards improved performance to the same extent as supraliminal rewards. So, the neural substrates of conscious versus unconscious reward pursuit are vastly different—but despite their differences, conscious and unconscious reward pursuit may still produce the same behavioral outcomes.

Fronto-striatal Dysfunction During Reward Processing in Unaffected Siblings of Schizophrenia Patients

“…65,71,72 Indeed, SMA activity has been consistently found during reward anticipation. [73][74][75][76] Our finding therefore suggests decreased reward-based motor preparation in siblings.…”

How motivation and reward learning modulate selective attention

“…However, when rewards were presented after the word, that is, during the active maintenance processing, performance increased when high rewards were presented subliminally, but decreased when they were presented supraliminally. Finally, Bijleveld et al (2014) studied the neural bases of subliminal and supraliminal monetary reward during a mental-rotation task fMRI study. They found that delivery of conscious and unconscious rewards produced the same behavioral outcomes.…”

The role of stop‐signal probability and expectation in proactive inhibition

“…Indeed, the striatum has a central role in learning as it is sensitive to prediction errors (Dreher, 2013;Vink et al, 2013), although this is almost exclusively studied in the context of reward processing and not response inhibition. Indeed, the expectation of reward is associated with striatal activation (O' Doherty, 2004;Bijleveld et al, 2014;Pas et al, 2014).…”