Distinct nucleotide patterns among three subgenomes of bread wheat and their potential origins during domestication after allopolyploidization

Abstract

Background The speciation and fast global domestication of bread wheat have made a great impact on three subgenomes of bread wheat. DNA base composition is an essential genome feature, which follows the individual-strand base equality rule and [AT]-increase pattern at the genome, chromosome, and polymorphic site levels among thousands of species. Systematic analyses on base compositions of bread wheat and its wild progenitors could facilitate further understanding of the evolutionary pattern of genome/subgenome-wide base composition of allopolyploid species and its potential causes. Results Genome/subgenome-wide base-composition patterns were investigated by using the data of polymorphic site in 93 accessions from worldwide populations of bread wheat, its diploid and tetraploid progenitors, and their corresponding reference genome sequences. Individual-strand base equality rule and [AT]-increase pattern remain in recently formed hexaploid species bread wheat at the genome, subgenome, chromosome, and polymorphic site levels. However, D subgenome showed the fastest [AT]-increase across polymorphic site from Aegilops tauschii to bread wheat than that on A and B subgenomes from wild emmer to bread wheat. The fastest [AT]-increase could be detected almost all chromosome windows on D subgenome, suggesting different mechanisms between D and other two subgenomes. Interestingly, the [AT]-increase is mainly contributed by intergenic regions at non-selective sweeps, especially the fastest [AT]-increase of D subgenome. Further transition frequency and sequence context analysis indicated that three subgenomes shared same mutation type, but D subgenome owns the highest mutation rate on high-frequency mutation type. The highest mutation rate on D subgenome was further confirmed by using a bread-wheat-private SNP set. The exploration of loci/genes related to the [AT] value of D subgenome suggests the fastest [AT]-increase of D subgenome could be involved in DNA repair systems distributed on three subgenomes of bread wheat. Conclusions The highest mutation rate is detected on D subgenome of bread wheat during domestication after allopolyploidization, leading to the fastest [AT]-increase pattern of D subgenome. The phenomenon may come from the joint action of multiple repair systems inherited from its wild progenitors.

Copy number variation of WBP1L gene revealed its association with growth traits across Chinese cattle populations

“…It is mainly manifested as deletion or duplication at the submicroscopic level. These mutations are not only individual normal polymorphisms, but also pathogenic mutations, which are widely distributed in livestock and poultry genomes (Gheyas et al ., 2013; Zhao et al ., 2020). Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and CNVs are two important potential sources of phenotypic variation in livestock and poultry, and the mutation rate of CNV sites is higher than that of SNPs.…”

Genome-Wide Scan for Genetic Signatures Based on the Whole-Genome Resequencing of Salt- and Drought-Tolerant Rice Varieties

“…According to their effects, we classified the SNPs and InDels as high, moderate, low, and modifier variations. We also classified the variations into five genome annotation-related categories (i.e., UTR, missense or frameshift, splicing, promoter, and others) according to their type and location [38].…”

Evolutionary patterns of DNA base composition at polymorphic sites highlight the role of the environment in shaping barley and rice genomes

“…Recent research has focused on estimating the contributions to the higher [AT] values by examining different genomic regions or subgenomes. The results indicate that the non-genic part in soybean and maize genomes or a specific subgenome in wheat has a greater influence than others (Wang, Li, et al, 2019;Zhao et al, 2020). However, the environmental influence on the changes of genome-wide DNA base composition, specifically at the polymorphic site level, remains poorly understood.…”